openai

The global AI rivalry between the United States and China is often framed as a race. But that metaphor may be misleading. According to analysts, what’s unfolding looks less like a sprint—and more like a decathlon.
This week, Microsoft president Brad Smith joined Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Elon Musk in publicly warning that the US may be losing ground to China in the AI race. Not in cutting-edge models, but where it increasingly matters: real-world adoption beyond the West.
Not One Race, but Many
American companies still dominate advanced semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, AI platforms, and talent attraction. China, however, is pulling ahead in areas that translate faster into economic and geopolitical influence—industrial robotics, deployment of AI hardware, quantum communications, and battery technologies.
Crucially, China is winning hearts and servers across the Global South.
The Power of Cheap, Open AI
Chinese firms, backed by state subsidies, are exporting low-cost open-source AI models that are highly attractive to developing economies. Models like DeepSeek R1 may not be the most advanced—but they are accessible, affordable, and deployable at scale.
For over 140 countries, China is already a larger trading partner than the US. Through infrastructure, trade, and investment, Beijing is nudging these countries toward Chinese tech standards—AI included.
Hardware: America’s Edge—and China’s Leverage
The US still holds a major advantage in computing power. Nearly half of the world’s data center capacity is American, compared to roughly a quarter in China. Nvidia’s most advanced chips remain unmatched, and Chinese alternatives like Huawei’s Ascend still lag in performance and production scale.
But there’s a catch: rare earths.
China dominates the supply chain—controlling the vast majority of rare-earth mining, processing, and magnet production. The AI hardware of the future depends on materials Beijing already owns.
Trump’s Gamble
In December, the Trump administration reversed course and lifted some restrictions on exporting Nvidia’s H200 chips to China. The logic: better to keep China dependent on American hardware than to push it into full technological self-sufficiency.
Chinese tech giants like Alibaba and ByteDance are reportedly lining up massive orders—millions of chips worth tens of billions of dollars.
Supporters say this preserves US leadership. Critics warn it may accelerate China’s ability to close the compute gap.
The Real Risk
The core question isn’t who has the best models today—but who controls the ecosystem tomorrow.
As one analyst put it:
The US may own the blueprints and the code, while China owns the factories, the hardware, and the physical infrastructure.
If that happens, the balance of economic and geopolitical power could shift far beyond artificial intelligence.
The AI race isn’t being won in a lab.It’s being won in supply chains, emerging markets, and the real world.
$BTC
$ETH $BNB

#OpenAI releases "Healthcare Edition ChatGPT," accelerating the application of AI in medical settings.
Elon Musk teases major upgrade to Grok Code, supporting "one-click generation of complex code" next month.
#Immunefi to launch its platform token IMU on January 22nd.
#Ethereum Developer Conference ACDC#172: Glamsterdam progresses steadily, Hegota upgrade proposal launched.
Perplexity launches "Public Safety Edition," AI-supported for law enforcement decision-making.
#CoinRank #GM

We retail investors love a good show — and right now, nothing is more explosive than the upcoming market clash between Sam Altman’s OpenAI and Elon Musk’s SpaceX.
One promises to sell artificial intelligence to every business with a laptop.

The other wants to beam internet from space while building a bus to Mars.
But if you’re choosing who will truly dominate the stock market, the frontrunner is clear: OpenAI. At least, that’s the view of the author — and many analysts agree. Sam Altman, despite his flaws, has cleaner books, clearer revenue models, and a far more professional machine behind him.
Elon, meanwhile — charming as he may be — is still burning through mountains of cash to fund rockets, satellites, and Star Wars–style dreams.
And unlike Musk, Sam doesn’t miss deadlines quite so often.
We are on the verge of witnessing three of the biggest tech IPOs in history as OpenAI, SpaceX, and Anthropic race to pull in as much capital as possible from a market still intoxicated by the AI boom. Sure, many people still like Elon… but the fatigue is real.
People want results. They want a plan. They want a CEO who isn’t firing off thousands of controversial tweets in his mid-50s, calling for the dissolution of the EU or — astonishingly — advocating war crimes.

Elon’s rocket math no longer works for retail investors
Musk keeps distracting the audience with shiny objects and online drama, but Tesla shares are down year-over-year, the financials are underwhelming, and investors are beginning to treat him like a friend who never pays you back.
This is the same Musk who attended a dinner with President Trump to celebrate the illegal capture of Venezuela’s President Maduro — and then publicly called him an alleged pedophile in a now-infamous deleted tweet. His political extremism helped push Tesla off its throne as the world’s largest EV maker in 2025, and sales have fallen sharply across global markets.
Trump even claimed Musk is “addicted to fentanyl and almost never sober.”
Meanwhile, OpenAI is quiet on the outside but ruthless on the inside. Altman is winning lawsuits, staying focused, and chasing enterprise contracts. The legal fight between him and Musk over OpenAI’s origins continues in San Francisco — and Sam showed up heavily armed. His legal firepower? Morrison & Foerster and Wachtell Lipton.
Musk’s legal bench? Small boutique firms — plus one guy who moonlights as a clown, Jaymie Parkkinen. “None of my comedy friends believe I’m a lawyer,” Parkkinen admitted. That’s not a metaphor. It is written in court transcripts.

OpenAI is already making money — real money
This is where the gap becomes obvious.
ChatGPT is not just a cool product — it’s a full-fledged enterprise engine. Microsoft invested billions. Companies pay subscriptions. Every API call means revenue. Yes, compute costs are high, but demand is higher.
Once OpenAI hits the stock market, it will roar.
Even Jim Cramer weighed in:

“The biggest winner from limiting power-gating could be META,” he said, “because it can cut costs — and OpenAI won’t be able to build its expensive infrastructure: not enough workers, not enough equipment.”
Maybe. But once OpenAI opens the floodgates of public capital, everything changes — fast.

Retail investors prefer banks over chaos
OpenAI reached a valuation of $500 billion in October and now aims to double it through a $1 trillion IPO. Wall Street loves anything that produces predictable cash flow — especially one that doesn’t need government subsidies, NASA babysitting, or a launch pad.
SpaceX, meanwhile, sold shares last December at an $800 billion valuation, and Musk insists he will list the company in Q4 2026. But every Musk timeline feels the same: loud, self-confident — and utterly unreliable.
Starship is still delayed.

Starlink has become a strange hybrid of telecom service and satellite monopoly.

Yes, it might one day produce consistent revenue — but right now it’s burning cash in orbit with no clear business model.

IPO analysts are calling this a market-shifting moment
Samuel Kerr of Mergermarket says this wave of IPOs could reshape how tech companies raise capital. For years, firms stayed private to shield intellectual property from reporting requirements. Now, the AI arms race demands money — billions of dollars. Staying private simply doesn’t work when you need 100,000 GPUs.
That’s why these IPOs are happening.
JPMorgan’s Matthieu Wiltz confirms a “strong demand environment,” with deal value up 47% despite global tariffs and wars. “There is excess liquidity,” he told Bloomberg. “We even decline deals when we think there are no covenants.”
But when structure exists — JPMorgan is ready.

And OpenAI has structure.

SpaceX valuations? Mostly hype
Kerr floated the idea of SpaceX hitting a $1.5 trillion valuation. But it’s just speculation. Retail investors have been burned before. They remember promises. They remember earnings calls. And yes — they remember the crashes.
Generation Z investors prefer Sam over Elon. Nobody makes TikToks about Starship engines.

But everyone uses ChatGPT.

Final verdict: The winner seems obvious
While Musk is juggling politics, scandals, legal chaos, and multi-billion-dollar hardware challenges, Sam Altman is staying laser-focused:
predictable revenue,massive global user base,enterprise adoption,deep-pocketed partners,and a product already embedded into daily life.
OpenAI looks like the next great stock-market titan.

SpaceX looks… visionary, expensive, and chronically late.
And investors — especially younger ones — are casting their votes with their wallets.
The real battle of Silicon Valley has begun. And Sam Altman is currently leading.

#ElonMusk , #SpaceX , #SamAltman , #OpenAI , #AI

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“