samaltman

Elon Musk is seeking up to $134 BILLION in damages from OpenAI in a newly filed lawsuit.

🔷Musk’s legal team argues that his early funding and involvement materially contributed to OpenAI’s rise, which is now valued at $500+ billion.

🔷The lawsuit says OpenAI has become a for-profit company, entitling Musk to compensation tied to the value created from his early contributions.

🔷Musk helped found OpenAI in 2015 and donated approximately $38 million in early funding.

🔷When asked about the lawsuit, Elon Musk responded:

“I’ve lost a few battles over the years, but I’ve never lost a war.”

Buckle up for a historic lawsuit.

#ElonMuskTalks #elon #ElonMusk. #SamAltman #OpenAI

Tensions between Elon Musk and OpenAI are escalating. The AI company has warned investors that the Tesla CEO may present “exaggerated and attention-seeking” statements during the April 2026 court trial. The case stems from Musk’s ongoing legal battle against the firm he co-founded in 2015 — now valued at over $500 billion.

A battle over billions and principles
Musk claims he was misled when OpenAI shifted from its nonprofit roots to a for-profit model, forming a multibillion-dollar alliance with Microsoft. He argues he deserves a share of all intellectual property created since the company’s early days — potentially worth billions.
OpenAI strongly disagrees. In a recent letter to investors, it described the lawsuit as “baseless,” adding that any legitimate claim Musk might have would be limited to the $38 million he donated in the company’s early stages.

Trial moves forward
The court has ruled that the case will proceed to a jury trial, giving both sides a chance to present their arguments. OpenAI expects Musk to lean on media-driven tactics, but says its legal team is fully prepared to set the record straight.
“Elon’s lawsuit remains unfounded. We’re confident the jury will see through these claims,” an OpenAI spokesperson said.

From collaborators to rivals
The trial represents more than just a legal dispute — it's a public breakdown between early collaborators now divided over power, principles, and profit. Once united in their vision of safe AI for humanity, Musk and OpenAI now find themselves on opposite sides of a battle that could reshape the rules around artificial intelligence.
Today, the company is valued at over half a trillion dollars and leads the AI space. But the path forward will likely include more challenges — both legal and ethical.

#ElonMusk , #OpenAI , #SamAltman , #technews , #AI

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

We retail investors love a good show — and right now, nothing is more explosive than the upcoming market clash between Sam Altman’s OpenAI and Elon Musk’s SpaceX.
One promises to sell artificial intelligence to every business with a laptop.

The other wants to beam internet from space while building a bus to Mars.
But if you’re choosing who will truly dominate the stock market, the frontrunner is clear: OpenAI. At least, that’s the view of the author — and many analysts agree. Sam Altman, despite his flaws, has cleaner books, clearer revenue models, and a far more professional machine behind him.
Elon, meanwhile — charming as he may be — is still burning through mountains of cash to fund rockets, satellites, and Star Wars–style dreams.
And unlike Musk, Sam doesn’t miss deadlines quite so often.
We are on the verge of witnessing three of the biggest tech IPOs in history as OpenAI, SpaceX, and Anthropic race to pull in as much capital as possible from a market still intoxicated by the AI boom. Sure, many people still like Elon… but the fatigue is real.
People want results. They want a plan. They want a CEO who isn’t firing off thousands of controversial tweets in his mid-50s, calling for the dissolution of the EU or — astonishingly — advocating war crimes.

Elon’s rocket math no longer works for retail investors
Musk keeps distracting the audience with shiny objects and online drama, but Tesla shares are down year-over-year, the financials are underwhelming, and investors are beginning to treat him like a friend who never pays you back.
This is the same Musk who attended a dinner with President Trump to celebrate the illegal capture of Venezuela’s President Maduro — and then publicly called him an alleged pedophile in a now-infamous deleted tweet. His political extremism helped push Tesla off its throne as the world’s largest EV maker in 2025, and sales have fallen sharply across global markets.
Trump even claimed Musk is “addicted to fentanyl and almost never sober.”
Meanwhile, OpenAI is quiet on the outside but ruthless on the inside. Altman is winning lawsuits, staying focused, and chasing enterprise contracts. The legal fight between him and Musk over OpenAI’s origins continues in San Francisco — and Sam showed up heavily armed. His legal firepower? Morrison & Foerster and Wachtell Lipton.
Musk’s legal bench? Small boutique firms — plus one guy who moonlights as a clown, Jaymie Parkkinen. “None of my comedy friends believe I’m a lawyer,” Parkkinen admitted. That’s not a metaphor. It is written in court transcripts.

OpenAI is already making money — real money
This is where the gap becomes obvious.
ChatGPT is not just a cool product — it’s a full-fledged enterprise engine. Microsoft invested billions. Companies pay subscriptions. Every API call means revenue. Yes, compute costs are high, but demand is higher.
Once OpenAI hits the stock market, it will roar.
Even Jim Cramer weighed in:

“The biggest winner from limiting power-gating could be META,” he said, “because it can cut costs — and OpenAI won’t be able to build its expensive infrastructure: not enough workers, not enough equipment.”
Maybe. But once OpenAI opens the floodgates of public capital, everything changes — fast.

Retail investors prefer banks over chaos
OpenAI reached a valuation of $500 billion in October and now aims to double it through a $1 trillion IPO. Wall Street loves anything that produces predictable cash flow — especially one that doesn’t need government subsidies, NASA babysitting, or a launch pad.
SpaceX, meanwhile, sold shares last December at an $800 billion valuation, and Musk insists he will list the company in Q4 2026. But every Musk timeline feels the same: loud, self-confident — and utterly unreliable.
Starship is still delayed.

Starlink has become a strange hybrid of telecom service and satellite monopoly.

Yes, it might one day produce consistent revenue — but right now it’s burning cash in orbit with no clear business model.

IPO analysts are calling this a market-shifting moment
Samuel Kerr of Mergermarket says this wave of IPOs could reshape how tech companies raise capital. For years, firms stayed private to shield intellectual property from reporting requirements. Now, the AI arms race demands money — billions of dollars. Staying private simply doesn’t work when you need 100,000 GPUs.
That’s why these IPOs are happening.
JPMorgan’s Matthieu Wiltz confirms a “strong demand environment,” with deal value up 47% despite global tariffs and wars. “There is excess liquidity,” he told Bloomberg. “We even decline deals when we think there are no covenants.”
But when structure exists — JPMorgan is ready.

And OpenAI has structure.

SpaceX valuations? Mostly hype
Kerr floated the idea of SpaceX hitting a $1.5 trillion valuation. But it’s just speculation. Retail investors have been burned before. They remember promises. They remember earnings calls. And yes — they remember the crashes.
Generation Z investors prefer Sam over Elon. Nobody makes TikToks about Starship engines.

But everyone uses ChatGPT.

Final verdict: The winner seems obvious
While Musk is juggling politics, scandals, legal chaos, and multi-billion-dollar hardware challenges, Sam Altman is staying laser-focused:
predictable revenue,massive global user base,enterprise adoption,deep-pocketed partners,and a product already embedded into daily life.
OpenAI looks like the next great stock-market titan.

SpaceX looks… visionary, expensive, and chronically late.
And investors — especially younger ones — are casting their votes with their wallets.
The real battle of Silicon Valley has begun. And Sam Altman is currently leading.

#ElonMusk , #SpaceX , #SamAltman , #OpenAI , #AI

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

In a surprising turn of events that rippled through the tech and crypto markets, Worldcoin’s WLD token experienced a price adjustment amidst the news of Elon Musk's legal proceedings against OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman. The lawsuit, filed in a California court, brings to light Musk's allegations against OpenAI, accusing the organization and Altman of deviating from their initial non-profit mission, which aimed at advancing artificial general intelligence (AGI) for the global good.
The Genesis of the Dispute
Elon Musk, a pivotal figure in the foundation of OpenAI, has taken legal action based on claims that OpenAI’s partnership with Microsoft and its pivot towards a more commercial stance infringe upon the agreements made in 2015. Musk alleges that these moves betray the organization's commitment to developing AGI as a non-profit entity, aimed at counterbalancing the dominance of tech conglomerates.
The Essence of Musk’s Claims
Musk's contention rests on the assertion that OpenAI, under Altman's guidance, transitioned into a profit-oriented entity, contradicting the ethos of fostering AGI for altruistic purposes. He criticizes the collaboration with Microsoft for commercializing AGI endeavors, thus sidelining the foundational goal of serving humanity's interest. Musk, who has frequently voiced concerns over AI's potential risks, calls for a return to OpenAI’s original non-profit blueprint and seeks legal measures to halt the for-profit use of AGI technologies.
Impact on Worldcoin’s Market
Following the lawsuit's announcement, the WLD token witnessed a 5% decrease, touching $7.1, though it briefly recovered to $8.3. The fluctuation settled with the token stabilizing at $7.95, marking a modest 24-hour gain. Despite a 20.3% dip in trading volume, indicating a potential investor retraction from the token, market indicators like the EMA and RSI suggest a balanced outlook, with possibilities for both bullish momentum and corrections.
Broader Implications and Market Outlook
This legal battle underscores the growing tension between commercial pursuits and ethical standards in the realm of AI development. With Musk advocating for stringent AI regulation and ethical stewardship, the outcome of this lawsuit could set precedents affecting the intersection of technology, ethics, and commerce.
As for Worldcoin's WLD token, market watchers anticipate potential volatility, with future movements likely influenced by investor sentiment and broader market trends. The legal confrontation between Musk and OpenAI serves as a pivotal moment, reflecting the complexities of navigating the promising yet perilous terrain of artificial intelligence.
$WLD
#Worldcoin #elonmusk #samaltman

Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“