dao

🚀 $ICP Surges 30% — Here’s What the Market Is Pricing In
Internet Computer ($ICP ) has jumped over 30% in just two days, breaking out after weeks of quiet price action. The move pushed ICP toward the $3.70 zone, backed by a sharp rise in trading activity.
This wasn’t a random pump.
Momentum accelerated right as new details surfaced around a major tokenomics overhaul, changing how investors view ICP’s long-term supply dynamics.
📊 Volume Confirms Conviction
Trading volume exploded nearly 190% in 24 hours, reaching about $186M. That level of participation suggests broad market interest, not thin liquidity. When price and volume expand together, it usually points to a catalyst-driven move, not noise.
ICP also outperformed much of the broader market during this period, reinforcing the strength of the rally.
🔥 Mission 70: A Tokenomics Reset
The key driver is growing anticipation around Mission 70, a proposal from the DFINITY Foundation unveiled on January 13, 2026.

➡️ Cut ICP inflation by up to 70% by the end of 2026
Annual inflation is projected to fall from roughly 9.7% to around 5.4%, driven by:
Reduced token issuanceCapped voting rewardsShorter neuron dissolve delaysNode provider payouts cut by up to 49%
These changes directly address dilution — a major concern for long-term ICP holders.
🔥 Usage-Driven Burns Add Demand Pressure
ICP is also gaining from a growing burn narrative tied to real usage. As Internet Computer positions itself as an on-chain cloud and AI platform, applications burn ICP as they consume compute cycles.
With tools like Caffeine.ai and upcoming cloud engines, more activity means:

➡️ More ICP burned

➡️ Less supply in circulation
Weekly burns recently hit 18,728 ICP, one of the highest levels since late 2024, pointing to genuine network usage rather than speculation.
cryptp wahab

$ICP #AI #Tokenomics #CryptoNews #Layer1 #DAO

Internet Computer (ICP) has suddenly returned to the spotlight after posting a strong rally over the past 48 hours. Following weeks of muted movement, ICP price surged more than 30%, climbing toward the $3.70 resistance zone as market participation spiked. This rally did not occur in a vacuum. The acceleration began precisely as new information surfaced regarding a sweeping overhaul of ICP’s tokenomics.
Insights from crypto analyst Dao King shed light on why the Internet Computer price is reacting so aggressively and why this move reflects more than a routine market rebound.
ICP Rally Supported by a Major Spike in Trading Volume
The upward momentum in ICP price has been validated by a dramatic increase in trading volume. Within a single day, volume jumped nearly 190%, reaching approximately $186 million. Such a surge indicates strong, widespread engagement rather than a price move driven by low liquidity.
According to Dao King, when rising prices are accompanied by expanding volume—especially during periods of protocol-level change—it often signals genuine investor conviction. During this rally, ICP also outperformed several broader crypto benchmarks, reinforcing the idea that the move is catalyst-driven rather than random volatility.
Mission 70 Proposal Sparks Market Repricing
At the heart of the ICP price pump is anticipation surrounding Mission 70, a newly proposed tokenomics framework revealed by the DFINITY Foundation on January 13, 2026. The proposal targets a reduction in ICP inflation by as much as 70% by the end of 2026, representing one of the most aggressive supply-side reforms seen in a Layer 1 network.
Dao King characterizes Mission 70 as a structural reboot, not a superficial adjustment. Current annual inflation of around 9.7% is projected to fall to roughly 5.4%, with further declines expected as token burn mechanisms intensify. Key measures include capped governance rewards, shorter neuron dissolve periods, and significant cuts—up to 49%—in node provider compensation. Together, these changes directly address long-standing concerns around token dilution.
ICP Burn Mechanics Add Demand-Side Momentum
Beyond supply reduction, Internet Computer is also strengthening its demand narrative through token burns tied to real network usage. ICP operates as an on-chain compute platform, where smart contracts and applications consume “cycles,” permanently burning ICP in the process.
With products like Caffeine.ai and upcoming decentralized cloud and AI engines gaining traction, usage-driven burns are expected to accelerate. Dao King points out that this model creates organic demand pressure—something many Layer 1 chains struggle to achieve. Increased activity leads to higher burn rates, reinforcing scarcity as adoption grows.
Ecosystem Growth Reinforces ICP Price Strength
Recent on-chain metrics further validate the bullish case. Weekly ICP burns recently climbed to 18,728 ICP, marking one of the highest levels recorded since September 2024. This increase reflects genuine network utilization rather than short-term speculative trading.
Investor sentiment around Internet Computer is also improving due to its positioning in decentralized cloud infrastructure and AI-focused workloads. Even amid a relatively neutral broader market, ICP price has responded swiftly to signs of long-term structural improvement.
Final Thoughts
The recent ICP price surge demonstrates how quickly markets can reprice an asset when supply dynamics improve while real usage expands simultaneously. While the sustainability of the rally will depend on execution and continued ecosystem growth, the reaction to Mission 70 highlights why Internet Computer has firmly re-entered trader and investor discussions.

For now, ICP’s momentum underscores the impact that meaningful tokenomics reform—paired with real demand—can have on price action.
#DAO #AI

Let's talk about power. In traditional finance, you have none. In decentralized finance, governance is the promised land—but often, it’s a ghost town. Many projects launch with grand plans for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), only for voter turnout to be dismally low, dominated by whales, or focused on trivial matters. For a community-centric project like @Walrus 🦭/acc cracking the governance code isn’t just a feature; it’s the entire foundation of its legitimacy.

The journey for WAL holders should ideally move from "fun meme votes" (like choosing a new mascot hat) to steering real, impactful protocol parameters. This is where the rubber meets the road. Effective governance transforms a speculative asset into a digital citizenship. But how does a project get there?

First, it starts with accessible tools. The interface for voting must be seamless, gas-efficient (or gasless), and integrated directly into the platforms the community already uses. Complexity is the enemy of participation. Second, the proposals need to matter. Early proposals should be consequential but low-risk: treasury allocations for specific community events, choices between audit firms, or weighting parameters for liquidity incentives. This builds muscle memory.

For Walrus Protocol, the unique advantage is the pre-existing cohesive community rallied around the #Walrus identity. This social layer is a precursor to a strong political layer. The challenge is to harness that "pod" mentality and direct it towards collective decision-making that strengthens the protocol. The goal? To have the $WAL token be widely recognized not just as a ticker, but as a vote.

The most successful protocol governance models often include a council or delegated system to ensure consistent development momentum, balanced with direct democracy on key issues. Seeing how the Walrus team structures this—whether through a gradual handover of control or a novel mechanism like "governance mining"—will be a critical indicator of their commitment to true decentralization.

Ultimately, governance is what separates a project from a product. A product is used; a project is owned. If WAL holders can collectively guide the protocol’s future, then the value of the token becomes intrinsically linked to the success of the ecosystem they are actively building. That’s a powerful and sustainable value proposition far beyond any pump.

#Walrus #DAO #Governance #DeFi #Web3 $WAL @WalrusProtocol

One of the most compelling promises of Web3 is decentralized governance—the idea that the users of a protocol collectively steer its future. Yet, for many projects, governance is a ghost town. Token holders are apathetic, voter turnout is abysmal, and proposals are dominated by whales. But what if the community started as a tight-knit, culturally bonded group from day one? This is the unique governance opportunity facing @Walrus 🦭/acc and the WAL holders.

The #Walrus pod isn't just a random collection of speculators; it's a group that formed around a shared identity. This is powerful social capital. The challenge and opportunity for Walrus Protocol lie in channeling that cultural cohesion into effective, on-chain governance. Can a meme-born community evolve into a sophisticated, decision-making DAO?

The first step is setting up a framework that encourages participation, not just from whales, but from the small holder—the heart of any community-driven project. This might look like:

· Proposal Thresholds: Low enough that a dedicated group of small holders can band together to submit an idea.
· Discussion Phases: Robust off-chain forums (like the project's Discord or Telegram) where ideas are debated before hitting the chain, ensuring only well-vetted proposals move forward.
· Educational Content: The team or community leaders creating clear guides on how to vote, why governance matters, and the impact of different types of proposals.

For $WAL , governance shouldn't be an afterthought. It could be the core utility. Holding $WAL isn't just about price exposure; it's about owning a piece of the direction of the protocol. Will the treasury fund a new marketing initiative or a security audit? Should the protocol expand to another blockchain? Should partnership grants be issued? These are decisions that shape the project's destiny.

The beautiful part is that a community united by the walrus meme already has a shared language and culture. This can reduce the toxic tribalism that plagues many governance forums. Disagreements can happen within the context of "what's best for the pod," rather than pure financial antagonism.

However, the team must be willing to genuinely relinquish control. It's a delicate dance: providing guidance and expertise without being overly paternalistic. The roadmap should have a clear, scheduled transition to increasing levels of community control, moving from a "team-led" to a "community-governed" model.

Watching the Walrus Protocol navigate this will be a masterclass in digital democracy. If successful, it will prove that a strong meme and culture can be the foundational bedrock for a serious, decentralized autonomous organization. The pod wouldn't just be holding a token; it would be commanding the ship.

#Walrus #Governance #DAO #Web3 #Community $WAL @WalrusProtocol

One of the most overused and under-delivered promises in crypto is "decentralized governance." Many projects slap a basic snapshot page onto their website, call it a day, and continue to make all major decisions via a centralized team. The true test of a project’s commitment to decentralization isn’t its technology stack first—it’s its governance model. For a community-centric project like @Walrus 🦭/acc this is a golden opportunity to do it right and turn $WAL into a genuine instrument of collective will.

Imagine this: instead of just being a speculative asset or a ticket to an exclusive club, each WAL token represents a proportional "tusk" in the pod's decision-making process. But governance needs to be more than just voting on which CEX to list on next. Meaningful governance controls levers that affect the protocol's very foundation: treasury allocation parameters, fee structure adjustments, upgrade proposals for the core protocol, and even the election of a community multisig to oversee development grants.

The beauty of starting with a strong meme-narrative like #Walrus is that you begin with a politically engaged community. They’re already talking, debating, and creating. The challenge is to channel that energy from "wen moon" jokes into structured, informed discourse on protocol parameters. This requires excellent communication from the team—translating complex technical choices into clear, digestible proposals for the average holder.

For this to work, the Walrus Protocol team must build governance as a first-class feature, not an afterthought. This means a secure and user-friendly platform, well-documented proposal processes, and a culture that respects the outcome of votes, even when the core team disagrees. It also means incentivizing participation, perhaps through small rewards for voters or reputational systems within the community.

The end goal? A protocol that is truly owned and steered by its holders. A hostile takeover becomes impossible because control is distributed among thousands of dedicated pod members. Development becomes more resilient, as roadmaps are validated by the people who use the product. This depth of integration turns $WAL from a simple asset into a share of a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) with real purpose.

Watching to see if and how Walrus Protocol implements robust governance will be a key indicator of its long-term legitimacy. In a sea of centralized projects wearing decentralized masks, one that genuinely hands the tusks to its community will stand out as a beacon of crypto’s original ethos.

#Walrus #DAO #Governance #DeFi #Decentralization $WAL @WalrusProtocol

The Power of Community Governance in $DUSK

‎@Dusk believes in a future where the users own the network. The governance model for $DUSK allows holders to vote on key protocol upgrades and ecosystem fund allocations. This ensures that #Dusk remains aligned with the needs of its community and institutional users alike. As the network matures, the role of the $DUSK token in governance will become even more critical, allowing for a truly decentralized financial infrastructure that is resistant to capture by any single entity. Your $DUSK is your vote in the future of finance.

‎#Dusk #DAO #Governance #CommunityDriven #Decentralization

Let's be real: any project can promise decentralization, but few navigate the messy, beautiful reality of community governance successfully. For @Walrus 🦭/acc this isn't a box to check; it's the core evolutionary path from a centrally-led startup to a truly decentralized organism. The transition of power from the core team to the $WAL holding "Pod" will be the single most defining event in the project's lifecycle.

Governance is where memes meet serious capital allocation. It’s easy to rally around a funny walrus GIF; it’s harder to collectively decide on treasury spending, protocol upgrades, or fee parameters. The #Walrus community's maturity will be tested not by price pumps, but by the quality of its proposals and debates.

The first phase is often symbolic: "Vote on the new mascot's hat color." This builds familiarity with the voting interface. But quickly, it must progress. Real governance power means the community could direct funds from a community treasury to hire a developer team for a new feature, or partner with another protocol, or even vote to adjust incentives within the Walrus ecosystem itself. This transforms $WAL from a speculative asset into a productive capital asset—a key that unlocks decision-making rights.

However, the pitfalls are numerous. Voter apathy is a constant threat. Most token holders, even passionate ones, won't read 50-page technical proposals. This leads to low turnout, making the protocol vulnerable to takeover by a small, highly motivated (and potentially malicious) group. Then there's the "whale problem." If early backers or team members hold a significant chunk of $WAL , their vote can drown out the broader Pod. Sybil attacks, where one entity creates many wallets to simulate grassroots support, are another risk.

So, what does successful Walrus governance look like? It likely involves a blend of mechanisms:

· Delegated Democracy: Allowing holders to delegate their voting power to trusted, knowledgeable community members who can dedicate time to deep research.
· Proposal Thresholds: Setting realistic barriers for proposals to reach a vote, ensuring only well-constructed ideas with community backing make it to the ballot.
· Non-Financial Signaling: Using platforms like Discord and Snapshot for non-binding "temperature checks" before committing on-chain gas fees for formal votes.

The ultimate goal for Walrus Protocol should be to cultivate a culture of informed stewardship. This means the core team actively educating the community on the technical and financial implications of proposals, not just marketing the token. It means celebrating thoughtful debate, even disagreement, as a sign of health.

The projects that survive the next decade will be those whose communities feel true ownership. If the Pod can evolve from cheerleaders to capable governors, then the Walrus ecosystem will have built something far more valuable than code: a resilient, adaptable, and human-driven collective intelligence. That’s the real moonshot.

#Walrus #Governance #DAO #DeFi #CryptoCommunity $WAL @WalrusProtocol

Today I'll talk about DAO
1. Introduction
Naturally, when reading the title, I felt a heavy blow. DAO stands for Decentralized Autonomous Organization, mainly operating based on smart contracts. Decisions are made by the community rather than being controlled by a small group or an individual. That's the simple understanding.
2. As for the nature
Of course, it is not dependent on a single server or individual management. It operates autonomously according to code logic. It has goals and governance mechanisms to achieve them. For example, to withdraw funds from the treasury, what conditions are required, and how many people need to approve. That's why no one has the authority to change the rules. AI can also propose ideas or suggestions. But once a decision is passed, the smart contract will automatically execute and handle it without any intermediaries.