Honestly, I have been paying attention to RWA for a long time, but I have been stuck on one question:
Assets are on-chain, and then what? Most projects are either taken over by institutions or lie on the chain without any trading.
Recently, WorldAssets upgraded to RWAX, and for the first time, I feel that RWA really needs to enter 3.0. The difference is not in asset packaging, but whether the market has been built up first.
RWA 1.0 is about conceptually going on-chain, 2.0 relies on institutions, TVL, and whitelists; but the core of 3.0 is whether assets can quickly enter the public market, be traded, and be priced. And @RWAX_life's positioning is very clear—RWA's market layer is not about endorsing assets but about letting the market speak.
I would describe it in one sentence:
RWAX = RWA's Pump.Fun + DEX.
Asset parties submit basic information and Asset Proof to Create Token directly into the market, using Bonding Curve for early pricing and liquidity, with the issuance itself being a trade. Then, through RWA PUMP Ranking, attention is distributed based on market capitalization, trading volume, and momentum, with cold starts relying not on institutional hard pushes but on real market behavior emerging.
What I value more is not the narrative, but this mechanism. Once RWA starts pricing using on-chain data, the sector effect will appear. The most scarce thing in the early stage is not assets, but attention and pricing power.
If you're interested, go take a look; this might be the watershed for RWA entering the rules of Crypto.