tokenomics

🚀 $ICP En hausse de 30 % — Voici ce que le marché anticipe
Internet Computer ($ICP ) a grimpé de plus de 30 % en seulement deux jours, en cassant une tendance calme après plusieurs semaines. Ce mouvement a poussé ICP vers la zone de 3,70 dollars, soutenu par une forte augmentation de l'activité de trading.
Ce n'était pas une hausse aléatoire.
La dynamique s'est accélérée précisément au moment où de nouvelles informations ont émergé concernant une importante refonte de la tokenomie, modifiant la façon dont les investisseurs perçoivent la dynamique à long terme de l'offre de ICP.
📊 Le volume confirme la conviction
Le volume des échanges a augmenté de près de 190 % en 24 heures, atteignant environ 186 millions de dollars. Ce niveau d'engagement suggère un intérêt général du marché, et non une liquidité faible. Lorsque le prix et le volume augmentent ensemble, cela indique généralement un mouvement impulsé par un catalyseur, et non du bruit.

Inflation is the silent killer of token value. While necessary for initial incentives, uncontrolled emission schedules lead to a constant downward pressure on price as new tokens hit the market. The crypto elite has responded with a powerful concept: the deflationary engine. Projects like @Walrus 🦭/acc that are thinking long-term must consider how to implement sustainable scarcity models for $WAL .

Moving beyond simple "burn" mechanisms triggered by transactions, sophisticated deflationary models are integrated into the protocol's very utility. The idea is to create consistent, demand-driven buy pressure or supply reduction that outpaces any planned emissions. Here’s how a project like Walrus might architect this:

1. Fee Burning: A percentage of every fee generated by the Walrus Protocol—whether from swaps, transactions, or premium features—is used to automatically buy and burn $WAL from the open market. This ties token scarcity directly to protocol usage. The more the protocol is used, the more $WAL is permanently removed from circulation.

2. Strategic Buybacks: Instead of just burning, a portion of fees could be allocated to a community treasury to fund strategic buybacks during market lows or to provide deep liquidity. This stabilizes the floor and demonstrates a commitment to token health.

3. Lock-to-Access Models: Certain high-value features of the protocol could require users to lock a stake of $WAL for a period. This effectively reduces the liquid circulating supply, and the locked tokens could even be put to work in governance or yield generation for the locker, creating a dual benefit.

For the Walrus community, understanding these mechanics is paramount. It transforms the token from a passive asset into a key component of a self-sustaining economic machine. The question for holders shifts from "Wen marketing push?" to "How can we drive protocol adoption to trigger more burns?"

However, deflation for deflation’s sake is not a strategy. It must be built on top of genuine, fee-generating utility. A powerful burn mechanism attached to a protocol no one uses is meaningless. The primary focus must always be on building a product people want. The deflationary model is then the flywheel that rewards holders for that adoption’s success.

If executed correctly, this creates a compelling long-term value proposition for WAL. It becomes an asset with a theoretically shrinking supply against a (hopefully) growing demand curve driven by utility. In the vast, inflationary sea of meme coins and low-utility tokens, a well-designed deflationary engine is what can make a project stand the test of time. The walrus knows the value of a thick blubber layer for the long winter; a robust tokenomic model is just that for a crypto project.

#Walrus #Tokenomics #Deflationary #Scarcity #CryptoEconomics $WAL @WalrusProtocol

[Préface : Si tu ne comprends pas à quoi sert le jeton, alors tu joues à la roulette.]
Dans le monde de la crypto, 99 % des projets ont un jeton (Token) complètement déconnecté de leur activité réelle. Le protocole gagne beaucoup d'argent, mais cela n'a rien à voir avec la valeur de ton jeton, ce qu'on appelle la "théorie de l'inutilité du jeton de gouvernance".
Mais selon Ember, les infrastructures (chaînes de blocs de niveau 1) sont la seule exception.
Et Dusk Network, qui se concentre sur la finance et la conformité, a conçu ce qui peut être considéré comme le réseau le plus rigoureux de capture de valeur dans l'histoire de Web3.
Aujourd'hui, nous ne parlerons ni de sentiments, ni de visions, nous ne parlerons que d'argent.