The uncomfortable gap in many so called decentralized systems is not consensus or payments, but custody. Tokens move on-chain, yet the applications that give those tokens meaning quietly depend on centralized servers for files, state, and history. When those servers fail, get throttled, or are taken offline, decentralization turns out to be conditional. Walrus is built specifically to close that gap. Instead of assuming data is someone else’s problem, it treats storage as first class infrastructure. On Sui, Walrus uses blob storage to handle large, unstructured data and erasure coding to split and distribute that data across many operators so availability does not hinge on any single node or provider. That matters because decentralization only works if applications remain usable under stress, not just when markets are calm. $WAL sits inside this system as more than a payment token. It aligns who stores data, who verifies custody, and who bears consequences when guarantees are broken. Staking and governance are tied to long term performance, not short term throughput, which reduces the risk of quiet recentralization over time. What makes Walrus interesting is precisely that it does not try to feel exciting. It assumes churn, failures, and pressure, and designs around them. That is how infrastructure becomes real. By fixing the half-decentralized problem at the data layer, Walrus turns decentralization from a narrative into something applications can actually depend on.
WALUSDT
無期限
0.1414
-8.47%