zerogas

$SEI pieaug līdz 0,13 USD, kad tīkls noņem transakciju maksas, lai iegūtu masu pieņemšanu.
Notiek:
Nulles maksas: Sei tīkls noņem transakciju maksas, lai veicinātu HFT un spēļu pieņemšanu.
Pieņemšana: Xiaomi partnerība liek Sei maciņiem būt miljoniem telefoniem visā pasaulē.
Teknoloģija: "Giga atjauninājums" (2026. gada 1. ceturksnis) mērķis ir 200 000 TPS.
Cena: SEI pieauga par 8%, pārspējot tirgu.
Kāpēc tas ir svarīgi:
Nulles maksas + 200 000 TPS + iepriekš iebūvēts telefona iekšā = pieņemšanas svētā zeme. Sei pozicionē sevi kā "patērētāju ķēdi", kur Web2 lietotāji pat neuzzinās, ka viņi izmanto kriptovalūtu.

One of the most common questions I receive from traditional finance skeptics regarding Plasma ($XPL ) is a simple economic query: "If the transfers are free, how does the network survive?" It is a valid concern. In the Ethereum model, gas fees are the lifeblood that secures the network. However, Plasma is pioneering a different economic paradigm for 2025, one that shifts from a "User-Pays" model to a "Value-Capture" model. By analyzing the revenue sustainability of Plasma without the crutch of high gas fees, we uncover a sophisticated strategy that mirrors the evolution of Web2 tech giants rather than traditional blockchain rent-seeking.
The misconception lies in the word "free." While the end-user experience on Plasma often involves zero gas fees for stablecoin transfers, the costs are not vanishing; they are being abstracted and subsidized by the immense velocity of money. Plasma operates on a model similar to a credit card network but on-chain. Instead of charging the user $5 to send money, the network captures value through "Sponsorship Paymasters" and granular MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) redistribution. In this ecosystem, stablecoin issuers and large dApps pay for the block space because the sheer volume of user acquisition justifies the cost. It is the "Freemium" model applied to Layer 1 infrastructure: remove the barrier to entry (gas fees) to maximize the user base, then monetize the high-value economic activity that follows.
Currently trading at $0.26 with a healthy market structure, $XPL ’s valuation is beginning to reflect this utility. The revenue for validators doesn't come from gouging a user for a single transfer; it comes from the aggregate volume of the $7 billion TVL moving through the system. As the chain facilitates high-frequency trading, forex swaps, and cross-border remittances, the demand for $XPL as the underlying staking collateral increases. This creates a deflationary pressure similar to EIP-1559, but driven by B2B volume rather than retail gas wars. The market data supports this: while gas-heavy chains are seeing user churn, Plasma’s active wallet count has grown consistently this quarter, proving that economic friction is the biggest killer of adoption.
My own deep dive into the chain’s on-chain analytics revealed a fascinating trend. A significant portion of validator revenue is now generated from "Priority Fees" paid by institutional market makers who need guaranteed placement in the block, effectively subsidizing the free transactions for regular retail users. This is a Robin Hood-style mechanism engineered at the protocol level. It creates a symbiotic relationship where whales pay for speed, and in doing so, keep the network free for the average user in Vietnam or Nigeria sending remittances. This aligns perfectly with the 2025 trend of crypto acting as a backend for fintech apps, where the end-user shouldn't even know what a blockchain is.
However, this model is not without risks. It relies heavily on volume. If transaction throughput drops significantly, the revenue from MEV and priority fees could shrink, potentially squeezing validator margins. Yet, the opportunity is massive. If Plasma successfully cements itself as the "HTTP of Money"—a free, open layer for value transfer—the value of the network will not be measured in gas collected, but in the trillions of dollars of GDP it secures. For the long-term holder, $XPL represents a bet on a future where blockchain is invisible, seamless, and economically sustainable through scale rather than scarcity.
Do you prefer paying gas fees for control, or do you believe the 'free' model is the future of mass adoption? Share your perspective!
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL #Tokenomics #ZeroGas #CryptoEconomy #BinanceSquare

Ja ir viena lieta, kas joprojām biedē jaunpienācējus kriptovalūtā, tad tā ir gāzes maksas.
Tā ir tā brīža sajūta, kad tu esi gatavs veikt savu pirmo maiņu — un tu redzi “$6 gāzes maksa” uz $10 darījuma.
Šis berzes punkts ir tas, kas kavē masu pieņemšanu.
Bet nākotne strauji mainās — un nākamie miljards lietotāju varbūt pat nekad neredzēs gāzes maksu.
💡 Kas ir “Zero-Gas UX”?
Zero-Gas UX nozīmē, ka lietotāji var veikt blokķēdes darbības — sūtīt, mainīt, likt likmes, mintot — nemaksājot gāzi tieši.
Tā vietā dApps vai tīkli sponsorē darījumus, izmanto meta-darījumus vai apvieno tos caur Layer 2s.