الأخبار

According to PANews, the market capitalization of stablecoins on the Solana blockchain has reached a new record high of $15 billion, as reported by Cointelegraph. Data from Token Terminal indicates that this marks a 200% increase over the past year.

According to BlockBeats, on January 8, U.S. law firm Burwick Law announced progress in a lawsuit, stating that the plaintiff has filed a revised complaint in federal court. The complaint accuses Baton Corp, the operator of PumpFun, along with Solana Foundation, Solana Labs, and several executives, of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

According to PANews, Nasdaq-listed Solana treasury firm Upexi has updated its Solana (SOL) holdings. The company disclosed an increase of 67,594 SOL, bringing its total holdings to 2,174,583 SOL as of January 5, 2026. The current market value of these holdings exceeds $300 million. Additionally, Upexi announced a stock buyback, purchasing 416,226 shares at an average price of $1.92 per share. The company remains actively engaged in deploying capital for further SOL acquisitions and stock repurchases.

Ethereum and Solana are no longer divided only by questions of scalability. They are increasingly split by fundamentally different visions of what blockchain networks must be built to withstand — and what resilience actually means in a world of geopolitical risk, real-time markets, and institutional adoption.Recent exchanges between Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, and Anatoly Yakovenko, co-founder of Solana, surfaced two sharply contrasting definitions of resilience — one rooted in sovereignty and redundancy, the other in performance and economic viability.At stake is not just technical design, but the future shape of blockchain adoption.Vitalik Buterin: Resilience as Sovereignty and SurvivalIn a post on X revisiting Ethereum’s Trustless Manifesto, Buterin framed resilience as the ability of a blockchain to survive catastrophic failure scenarios — including political exclusion, infrastructure collapse, developer disappearance, and financial confiscation.Ethereum, he argued, was never designed to optimize for speed or convenience. Instead, its goal is to ensure that any user, anywhere in the world, can remain sovereign under hostile conditions.“Resilience is the game where anyone, anywhere in the world, will be able to access the network and be a first-class participant,” Buterin wrote.“Resilience is sovereignty.”In this framing, decentralization and redundancy are not inefficiencies but essential safeguards. Ethereum’s architecture — including multiple independent execution and consensus clients — is intended to reduce the risk of single-point failures that could halt the network entirely.Solana’s Yakovenko: Resilience Through PerformanceYakovenko responded to Buterin’s post by calling it a “cool vision,” while offering a starkly different interpretation of resilience.For Solana, resilience is inseparable from performance — specifically, the ability to synchronize massive volumes of information globally at high throughput and low latency, without relying on trusted intermediaries.“If the world can benefit from 1gbps and 10 concurrent 10ms batch auctions, then that’s the floor we must deliver reliably across the planet,” Yakovenko wrote.“If it’s 10gbps and 100 1ms auctions, then that’s what we will deliver.”In this view, a blockchain that cannot reliably handle real-time markets, payments, and auctions at scale is not resilient, regardless of its philosophical commitments.The Trilemma Debate ReignitedThe exchange followed Buterin’s comments earlier this week claiming that Ethereum has effectively solved the blockchain trilemma — decentralization, security, and scalability — through technologies such as PeerDAS and zero-knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machines (zkEVMs).That assertion sharpened scrutiny of Ethereum’s roadmap and reopened debate over whether resilience should be measured by redundancy and censorship resistance, or by speed and economic competitiveness.Cyber Capital founder Justin Bons pushed back forcefully, arguing that Ethereum’s approach risks falling behind.“The path ETH has chosen is a losing one,” Bons wrote.“Objectively unable to compete on capacity within competitive timelines and also unable to compete on speed at all.”In his view, performance constraints and economic realities cannot be treated as secondary concerns indefinitely.Redundancy vs. Performance: Two Resilience ModelsEthereum’s resilience thesis is grounded in architectural caution. The network favors gradual scaling, redundancy, and conservative upgrades designed to minimize systemic risk.Earlier this week, Ethereum developers raised the network’s blob limit for the second time, incrementally increasing data throughput while prioritizing node safety and fee stability. Rather than pushing execution speed aggressively, Ethereum continues to favor measured capacity increases.Validator behavior has reinforced that narrative. In early January, Ethereum’s validator exit queue fell close to zero, signaling renewed willingness among validators to lock up capital long-term — often interpreted as confidence in Ethereum’s security model and roadmap.Solana’s model, by contrast, prioritizes resilience through sustained high performance. Yakovenko’s comments reflect a belief that future financial systems will demand real-time execution, and that reliability must be proven under maximum load, not theoretical stress scenarios.While Solana suffered high-profile outages in earlier cycles, the network has since hardened its infrastructure through protocol upgrades, fee markets, and operational improvements.Institutional Signals and Trade-OffsEach approach carries risks.Ethereum’s long-term resilience claims depend on the successful implementation of complex systems such as zkEVMs and proposer-builder separation — designs that remain largely untested at full mainnet scale. Critics argue these could introduce new centralization pressures by shifting influence toward specialized, capital-intensive builders, potentially creating liveness risks if those layers fail.Institutional behavior offers another lens. Ethereum remains the dominant settlement layer for stablecoins and tokenized U.S. Treasurys, reflecting institutional preference for predictability, regulatory comfort, and conservative risk profiles.Solana, meanwhile, has gained traction in performance-sensitive use cases. Tokenized real-world assets on Solana reached record levels in late 2025, while spot Solana ETFs and enterprise payment pilots have accelerated adoption.Two Futures, Two Definitions of ResilienceTaken together, the debate highlights a widening philosophical divide.Ethereum is optimizing for survivability under extreme conditions, even if that comes at the cost of speed. Solana is optimizing for economic viability and real-time performance, even if it requires tighter coordination and more aggressive engineering.Both networks are betting that their definition of resilience will matter more as blockchain adoption moves from experimentation to global financial infrastructure.Which vision prevails may ultimately depend not on ideology, but on what kind of stress the next phase of adoption places on blockchains — and which systems prove resilient when it counts.

According to BlockBeats, the Solana-based leveraged prediction market, Space, has successfully raised over $10 million, reaching a total of $10.55 million.The public sale is structured with a fixed $50 million fully diluted valuation (FDV), offering $2.5 million worth of tokens. Once this target is achieved, the sale will continue, with the FDV increasing linearly until it reaches $99 million. After the public sale concludes, participants will receive tokens at a unified price determined through calculations.

According to BlockBeats, a trader known as '百胜战神' (0x4331c) recently closed a $6.58 million short position on SOL, earning a profit of $10,000. Previously, this address completed a total of 121 transactions, with only one resulting in a $47 loss. The remaining 120 transactions were closed with profits, bringing the total account profit to $273,800.

According to ChainCatcher, Solana has shared a review of its 2025 data performance on the X platform, showcasing substantial growth across various metrics. The network's revenue reached $14 billion, marking a 48-fold increase over two years. The average daily active wallets numbered 3.2 million, reflecting a 50% year-on-year growth and setting a new record. The supply of stablecoins at the end of the year reached $14.8 billion, more than doubling from the previous year, also achieving a historical high. Additionally, the amount of staked SOL reached 421 million, an 8% increase, setting another record.In other developments, Memecoin trading volume amounted to $482 billion, experiencing a 10% decrease compared to the previous year. Launchpad revenue doubled year-on-year, reaching $762 million. The net inflow for SOL spot ETFs was $1.02 billion. Furthermore, DEX trading volume hit $1.5 trillion, a 57% increase from the previous year, marking a new all-time high.

According to BlockBeats On-chain Detection, stablecoin issuer Circle has minted an additional 1 billion USDC on the Solana network within the past 24 hours. Since 2026, Circle has cumulatively issued approximately 1.75 billion USDC on the Solana blockchain.

According to PANews, data from SolanaFloor reveals that Solana's annual perpetual decentralized exchange (DEX) trading volume reached an unprecedented $451.2 billion in 2025. This figure surpasses the cumulative perpetual trading volume recorded on the network since its inception.

According to PANews, Jito Labs has announced the launch of the IBRL Explorer tool, which provides a transparent view of the construction details within Solana blocks. The tool has identified prevalent behaviors such as 'Late Packing' and 'Slot Timing Games' within the Solana network. These practices are affecting the efficiency of state propagation, increasing latency, and undermining network stability. The IBRL Explorer utilizes three scoring mechanisms—Slot Time, Vote Packing, and Non-Vote Packing—to generate an IBRL score for each validator, aiming to enhance block construction quality and network performance.

According to Odaily, data from SoSoValue indicates that on January 5, Solana spot ETFs experienced a total net inflow of $16.24 million. The Bitwise SOL ETF BSOL led the inflows with $12.47 million, bringing its historical total net inflow to $638 million. Following this, the Fidelity SOL ETF FSOL recorded a net inflow of $2.04 million, with a historical total net inflow of $122 million. As of the time of reporting, the total net asset value of Solana spot ETFs stands at $1.09 billion, with a Solana net asset ratio of 1.40% and a cumulative historical net inflow of $792 million.

According to Foresight News, Nasdaq-listed Solana treasury company DeFi Development (DFDV) has announced an increase in its SOL holdings by over 25,000 tokens in the past month. As of January 1, 2026, the company's total SOL holdings have reached 2,221,329 tokens, with more than 15% deployed on-chain. Additionally, DFDV holds $9 million in cash, stablecoins, and other tokens. The company also disclosed that it spent approximately $11.5 million in the fourth quarter of last year to repurchase 2,049,113 shares.

According to ChainCatcher, Arkham data reveals that at 19:50, a total of 14,999.99 SOL was transferred from an anonymous address, beginning with A6ajv, to FixedFloat.

According to PANews, there are signs of resurgence in the meme coin market on Solana. The trading volume on Solana's meme coin launchpad platform has reached a three-month high, with daily trading volume, the number of tokens launched, and the daily number of tokens 'graduating' all hitting their highest levels in three months.

According to Odaily, Raydium announced on the X platform that the USD1 trading volume on Solana exceeded $260 million in the past 24 hours.

According to Odaily, Coin Bureau recently shared on the X platform that the latest liquidation data indicates a potential risk for SOL traders. If the price of SOL increases by 10%, short positions valued at $217 million could face liquidation. Conversely, a 10% decrease in price could put long positions worth $183 million at risk. Currently, SOL is trading around $132, with leveraged positions densely stacked on both sides.

According to BlockBeats, Solana is preparing for a significant upgrade named Alpenglow, which aims to overhaul its consensus mechanism. This upgrade will replace Tower BFT and Proof of History (PoH) to achieve sub-second finality. Alpenglow introduces two new protocol components: Votor and Rotor.Votor replaces the incremental voting rounds of Tower BFT with a lightweight vote aggregation model. Validators can aggregate votes off-chain before submitting final confirmations, allowing blocks to achieve finality within one to two confirmation rounds. This improvement reduces theoretical finality latency to 100 to 150 milliseconds, a significant decrease from the original 12.8 seconds. Votor achieves final confirmation through two parallel paths: a fast confirmation is triggered and immediately effective when a proposed block receives over 80% total stake weight support in the first round; if the first-round support is between 60% and 80%, a slow confirmation is triggered, requiring a second-round vote exceeding 60% for final confirmation.Rotor restructures Solana's block propagation layer. The existing Turbine propagation network relies on multi-hop relays with variable delays, while Rotor introduces a stake-weighted relay path prioritizing bandwidth efficiency. Validators with high stakes and reliable bandwidth will become core relay points. Simulations indicate that under typical bandwidth conditions, block propagation can be completed in as little as 18 milliseconds. This upgrade is expected to be gradually implemented, with an initial rollout anticipated between early and mid-2026.