Elon Jamess

Binance one of the world’s leading cryptocurrency exchanges, provides a range of tools for users to earn passive income through their crypto holdings. Whether you're a seasoned trader or a beginner, there are multiple ways you can earn on Binance. Here's a step-by-step guide to help you get started.
1. Register and Verify Your Binance Account
The first step in earning on Binance is to have an account. Here’s how you can get started:
Sign Up:
Go to the Binance website or download the Binance app.
Click on "Sign Up" and enter your email address or mobile number.
Create a strong password.
Identity Verification (KYC):
To access higher withdrawal limits and unlock certain features, complete the KYC (Know Your Customer) process.
Provide documents such as a passport or driver’s license for identity verification.
Enable Two-Factor Authentication (2FA):
To enhance the security of your account, enable 2FA using an app like Google Authenticator.
2. Deposit Funds Into Your Binance Account
Once your account is set up and verified, you need to deposit funds to begin earning.
Deposit Crypto:
If you already own cryptocurrency, deposit it into your Binance wallet by clicking "Deposit" and choosing the crypto asset you want to transfer.
You’ll be provided with a unique deposit address to send your crypto.
Deposit Fiat:
Binance allows you to deposit fiat currency (USD, EUR, etc.) through bank transfers, credit cards, or third-party services like Simplex.
Choose your preferred payment method and complete the deposit.
3. Staking: Earning Passive Income with Crypto
Staking involves locking your cryptocurrency in a blockchain network to help secure and validate transactions. In return, you earn rewards.
Navigate to Binance Earn:
On the Binance homepage, click on "Earn" and then "Staking."
Choose a Staking Product:
Binance offers different staking options like locked staking, flexible staking, and DeFi staking.
Locked Staking: Higher rewards, but you must lock your funds for a set period (e.g., 30 days, 60 days).
Flexible Staking: Funds can be withdrawn at any time, but rewards are typically lower.
DeFi Staking: Binance connects you with decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, allowing you to earn from decentralized networks.
Select the Cryptocurrency to Stake:
Choose a crypto asset (e.g., ADA, ETH, BNB) from the available list.
Enter the amount you want to stake and the duration (if applicable).
Confirm and Start Earning:
After confirming the details, click "Subscribe" to start staking.
You will begin earning staking rewards directly into your Binance wallet.
4. Savings: Flexible and Fixed Savings Accounts
Binance offers both flexible and fixed savings products, allowing you to earn interest on your crypto holdings.
Flexible Savings:
Your funds remain accessible at any time.
Interest rates are typically lower but offer more flexibility than locked options.
Fixed Savings:
You lock your funds for a predetermined period (e.g., 7 days, 30 days) in exchange for higher interest rates.
After the lock-up period ends, you can withdraw your funds along with the interest earned.
How to Use Binance Savings:
Go to "Earn" and select "Savings."
Choose either Flexible or Fixed savings, select the crypto asset (such as USDT or BNB), and enter the amount you wish to deposit.
Confirm the deposit, and your crypto will start earning interest immediately.
5. Liquidity Pools: Yield Farming with Binance
Yield farming allows you to earn rewards by providing liquidity to decentralized exchanges (DEX) or Binance’s liquidity pools.
Access Liquidity Pools:
On Binance, navigate to "Earn" and select "Liquidity Farming" under "Binance Liquid Swap."
Choose a Pool:
Binance provides several liquidity pools that require two assets (e.g., BNB/USDT, ETH/USDT).
Select the pool that you want to participate in.
Add Liquidity:
Enter the amount of each asset you want to add to the pool.
Binance will calculate the total liquidity value and your share in the pool.
After adding liquidity, you will receive liquidity provider (LP) tokens that represent your stake in the pool.
Earn Rewards:
By providing liquidity, you’ll earn rewards in the form of trading fees, as well as additional rewards from Binance for participating in their liquidity pools.
Your rewards will be automatically added to your account.
6. Binance Launchpool: Early Access to New Tokens
Binance Launchpool allows users to stake BNB, BUSD, or other tokens in exchange for new tokens in the early stages.
Navigate to Binance Launchpool:
Go to the "Earn" section and select "Launchpool."
Choose a Project:
Binance regularly lists new projects on the Launchpool platform.
Look for a project you are interested in and review the details.
Stake and Earn Tokens:
You can stake BNB or other supported tokens in the project’s pool to earn the new token.
The longer you stake, the more of the new token you can earn.
Claim Your Rewards:
After the staking period, you can claim the new tokens directly into your Binance wallet.
7. Binance Auto-Invest: Dollar-Cost Averaging
Binance also offers an Auto-Invest feature that allows users to automatically invest in crypto on a regular schedule (e.g., weekly, monthly). This is ideal for long-term investors who want to minimize the risk of price volatility.
Set Up Auto-Invest:
Go to "Earn" and choose "Auto-Invest."
Select the cryptocurrency you want to invest in (e.g., BTC, ETH, etc.).
Choose Amount and Frequency:
Choose how much you want to invest and the frequency (daily, weekly, monthly).
Start Investing:
Once set up, Binance will automatically buy the selected cryptocurrency for you at the specified intervals.
Over time, you will accumulate more crypto, benefiting from dollar-cost averaging.
8. Referral Program: Earn by Inviting Friends
Binance offers a referral program that rewards you for bringing new users to the platform.
Access Your Referral Link:
In your Binance account, go to the referral page under "Profile" and find your unique referral link.
Invite Friends:
Share your referral link with friends, family, or on social media.
Earn Commissions:
When someone registers using your link and completes qualifying actions (such as trading or depositing funds), you’ll earn a commission.
Binance offers commissions on spot trading fees, futures trading fees, and more.
9. Futures Trading: Leverage for Higher Returns
If you’re more experienced with crypto trading, you can use Binance Futures to trade with leverage and potentially earn higher returns.
Access Futures Trading:
Go to the "Derivatives" section and select "Futures."
Choose a Contract:
Binance offers various futures contracts (e.g., USDT-M, COIN-M).
Select the contract you want to trade.
Apply Leverage:
Futures trading allows you to trade with leverage, meaning you can borrow funds to increase your exposure.
Be aware that while leverage amplifies potential profits, it also increases the risk of losses.
Trade and Earn:
Buy or sell crypto contracts based on your market analysis.
Profit from price movements in either direction.
10. Crypto Loans: Earn by Borrowing and Lending
Binance offers a lending platform where you can earn interest by lending your crypto to others.
Lend Your Crypto:
Go to "Earn" and select "Binance Loan."
Choose the crypto you want to lend, such as USDT, BNB, or ETH.
Set Loan Terms:
Specify the loan duration and interest rate.
Earn Interest:
Binance will match your loan offer with borrowers.
You will earn interest on your loan, and the borrower will repay you at the end of the loan term.
Conclusion
Binance offers numerous ways to earn from your crypto holdings, whether you prefer a passive income stream through staking and savings or an active approach through trading and liquidity farming. The key is to understand the risks involved and choose the methods that suit your investment goals and risk tolerance. Always keep learning and managing your risk, and you can make the most out of Binance’s vast range of earning opportunities.
#Write2Earn #Binance $BNB $BTC

@Plasma
#plasma
$XPL
The year 2025 has promised to be a turning point in the world of blockchain and cryptocurrencies with many new public chains launching and aiming to reshape the industry. One of the most hyped projects in this wave is Plasma, a blockchain project backed by stablecoin infrastructure. Plasma raised over $75 million during its initial fundraising and was immediately listed on major exchanges like Binance, Bybit, and OKX. But as time passed, things didn’t go as planned for its token, XPL. What began as a promising start quickly turned into a tale of disappointment with its price crashing by over 90%, from a high of $1.68 in late September to a current price of just $0.14. So, the big question now is, can Plasma escape this typical scenario where institutional investors make profits, and retail investors are left holding the bag?
The Tokenomics Problem: High FDV and Low Circulation
To understand why XPL has struggled, we have to look at its tokenomics, which are at the heart of the issue. The total supply of XPL is set at 10 billion tokens, but only 10% of these tokens, or 1 billion, were available for the public sale. The rest is allocated as follows: 4 billion tokens for ecological development, 2.5 billion for the project’s team, and 2.5 billion for early investors. On paper, these numbers may sound reasonable, but the problem lies in how these tokens are distributed and when they are unlocked.
XPL’s circulation is currently quite low, with only around 2.05 billion tokens in the market, which is less than 21% of the total supply. This leaves a massive portion—around 79% of the tokens—locked and ready to be released at some point. The real issue, however, is the timing of these unlocks. Although the white paper specifies a one-year lock-up period for the project team and investors, and that tokens will be released over a two-year period after that, the reality is that the tokens for the team and investors won’t be unlocked until mid-2026. This means that when XPL first started circulating, most of the tokens were still held by the project’s team, developers, and early investors, creating a situation where retail investors had a tiny portion of the total supply.
To make matters worse, the unlocking process has already started, and it's creating selling pressure. For instance, on December 25th, 2025, nearly 89 million XPL tokens were unlocked, increasing the circulation from 1.96 billion to 2.05 billion. This may seem like a small increase, but it's just the beginning. The project is set to unlock similar amounts every month over the next year. If the price doesn’t rise, this continuous supply of new tokens will keep pushing the price down, causing immense selling pressure. In fact, given the current market cap of XPL at just $297 million, this new supply represents around $12.8 million in selling pressure every month. That’s over 4% of the market cap every month, which is a huge amount to deal with.
A Familiar Pattern: Price Drops and Community Discontent
Looking at XPL’s price performance paints a clear picture. Back in late September, XPL reached an all-time high of $1.68. This price surge came during a period filled with positive news—being listed on major exchanges, new ecosystem partners joining the project, and a sharp increase in the total value locked (TVL) in the network. However, despite these optimistic signs, the price started to fall in October and continued its downward trend, eventually reaching a historic low of $0.1158 in mid-December 2025. Although the price has slightly recovered to $0.14, this rebound is very small compared to the massive 90% drop.
In the community, there has been growing frustration. Some are calling XPL a "high FDV, low circulation" scam, where the project team inflates the price only to sell off their tokens, leaving retail investors to suffer. Others believe that the drop is mainly due to the exit of "mercenary capital"—investors who were simply looking for short-term profits, like those who jump into new projects for airdrops or staking rewards and sell as soon as their tokens unlock. While this explanation holds some weight, it isn’t the full picture. The real problem lies in the token’s design, which was never meant to benefit long-term holders.
The Ecosystem Growth Tokens and Centralized Control
One of the main issues with XPL’s tokenomics is the large chunk of tokens allocated for ecosystem growth. While it sounds good in theory—using 40% of the total supply for things like subsidizing gas fees, incentivizing developers, and supporting the network's protocol—how these tokens are spent is entirely under the control of the project’s team. There’s no transparency about how the tokens will be used, how much will be allocated at a time, or the pace at which they will be spent. This lack of control and transparency creates a situation where the project’s central team holds too much power, which contradicts the values of decentralized finance that the project claims to support.
The Lack of Demand for XPL and a Missed Value Capture Mechanism
Plasma’s problem is also compounded by the fact that there is little demand for XPL itself. While Plasma is designed to focus on stablecoin payments, most transactions—like those involving USDT—don’t require XPL for gas fees. This means that the demand for XPL is largely limited to non-stablecoin operations in DeFi protocols. However, this segment of the ecosystem is still small, meaning that XPL has yet to establish itself as an essential asset within the Plasma network.
On top of that, the white paper mentions a 5% annual inflation rate for staking rewards, but the staking system hasn’t been fully launched yet. Currently, only internal validating nodes are running, with no clear timeline for when staking will go live for the public. This lack of a functional staking system and the absence of a clear value capture mechanism for XPL are key reasons why the token’s price has struggled.
Lessons from XPL’s Decline: The Common Pitfalls of 2025 ICOs
The decline of XPL isn’t an isolated incident. Other projects launched around the same time, like Berachain and Initia, also saw similar crashes in their token prices. The reason behind these declines is largely the same: overvaluation, low circulation, and a rushed unlocking schedule. In each case, early investors who bought tokens at a low price pumped up the FDV through aggressive marketing, only to gradually exit as the token unlocked, leaving retail investors with massive losses.
Should the Big Investors Have Done More to Protect XPL?
Plasma’s backers are impressive, with high-profile firms like Founders Fund, Framework Ventures, and Bitfinex behind the project. These institutions have a lot of experience and capital, which makes it even more surprising that the price has crashed this dramatically. Given their involvement, you would expect them to have taken steps to protect the long-term health of the project and its token price. However, it appears that their main concern was likely to exit at the right price, rather than supporting the token in the long run.
What’s Next for XPL?
XPL’s future looks uncertain. The project team could buy back tokens to try to stabilize the price, but that would require a lot of capital and may not work in the long term. Another option is that Plasma could attempt to grow its ecosystem and drive real demand for XPL, but that would take time and there are no guarantees. Alternatively, the project could simply let the price continue to fall, as early investors can still make a profit even if the price keeps dropping.
Conclusion: Can XPL Turn Around?
XPL’s fate depends on whether Plasma can break free from the cycle of high FDV and low circulation that has plagued many other projects in 2025. Investors are becoming more aware of these risks, and the market is growing more cautious. The best advice for retail investors is probably to stay away for now and wait for the situation to calm down. XPL’s price has already dropped by 90%, but it’s still uncertain if it has truly hit bottom. Only time will tell if Plasma can turn things around, but in the meantime, caution is the best strategy.

@Dusk
#Dusk
$DUSK
The Dusk Foundation has been making waves in the crypto community as it prepares for the launch of its DuskEVM. As a privacy-focused Layer 1 chain with an emphasis on compliance, Dusk has certainly drawn attention, especially for its efforts in tokenizing real-world assets (RWAs). While the project brings some fresh ideas to the table, a deeper look at the data and ongoing developments reveals some concerning issues that might impact its future success.
What Makes Dusk Unique?
Dusk’s core proposition revolves around the idea of ‘compliant privacy’. At first glance, this seems contradictory – how can privacy and compliance coexist? The answer lies in Dusk’s use of zero-knowledge proof technology, which allows for private transactions while enabling regulators to verify compliance when needed. Traditional privacy coins like Zcash are fully anonymous and have struggled to gain regulatory acceptance, but Dusk aims to solve this issue by offering a privacy solution that satisfies EU financial regulations like MiCA and MiFID II. In theory, this approach could be a breakthrough for privacy in the blockchain space, but how well it translates into actual usage is still unclear.
DuskEVM: Ethereum Compatibility With Privacy Protection
A key component of Dusk’s offering is the DuskEVM. This is an Ethereum-compatible execution environment designed to allow developers to write smart contracts using Solidity and deploy decentralized applications (DApps) that benefit from Dusk’s privacy features. It’s a promising development for developers who want to build in the Ethereum ecosystem but need privacy protection. The idea is great on paper – offering Ethereum’s vast developer base the ability to create privacy-focused DApps. However, when you dig into the actual usage of DuskEVM, the results are underwhelming.
Low On-Chain Activity: A Major Red Flag
The biggest concern about DuskEVM comes from its on-chain activity. In the past 90 days, Dusk’s network has only seen an average of 829 transactions per day. In comparison, Ethereum handles millions of transactions every day, and even smaller Layer 2 solutions can handle tens of thousands of transactions per day. A daily volume of just 829 transactions suggests that Dusk is operating more like a testnet than a live mainnet. This is further underscored by the fact that in the last 100 blocks, only two active addresses were found, meaning the network is barely being used at all.
TVL and Ecosystem: Almost Non-Existent
Another major issue for Dusk is its Total Value Locked (TVL), which is alarmingly low. As of now, the TVL is essentially zero. DeFiLlama doesn’t even track Dusk’s protocols, and the first decentralized exchange (DEX) on DuskEVM, PieSwap, has a locked value of just over $500,000. This is a far cry from what a healthy Layer 1 public chain should have, which would typically see hundreds of millions of dollars in TVL. A chain with such low TVL doesn’t inspire confidence in its long-term viability, and the current data raises serious questions about its adoption.
Transaction Fees: A Potential Issue for Sustainability
One of the most troubling signs of the Dusk network is its transaction fees. A quick look at recent transactions revealed that the gas price and transaction fees were both listed as zero. This either means the network is still in a testing phase or users are being subsidized. While it’s not uncommon for early-stage projects to offer zero fees, a sustainable economic model is crucial for attracting validators and developers. Without meaningful transaction fees, it’s hard to see where the staking rewards for Dusk’s Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism will come from. The minimum stake requirement for PoS is 1,000 DUSK, but if the network remains underutilized, it could struggle to attract enough validators to keep the system running smoothly.
The Technical Framework: Impressive but Lacking Users
Technically, Dusk has some interesting innovations. The network operates on a dual-layer design, with DuskDS responsible for consensus and privacy, while DuskEVM handles smart contract execution. The Phoenix protocol ensures private transactions, and the Moonlight protocol allows for public transactions, offering a unique way of switching between the two. Additionally, Dusk’s Citadel zero-knowledge identity system enables KYC (Know Your Customer) without revealing personal information, which is an interesting step forward in the privacy space.
However, none of this matters if there are no users or developers to make use of these features. While Dusk’s technology is certainly advanced, the lack of real-world applications is a big problem. A blockchain project is only as strong as its ecosystem, and without users and developers, Dusk’s tech remains theoretical.
Facing Tough Competition in the Privacy Sector
Dusk is not the only project in the privacy space. Aztec, Secret Network, and Oasis are all working on privacy solutions, each with their own unique take. Aztec is developing a privacy layer for Ethereum, while Secret Network already has a number of DeFi applications running on encrypted smart contracts. Oasis has also established a developer community around its Sapphire privacy chain. In comparison, Dusk’s focus on compliant privacy and RWAs puts it in a niche market. While this could be a unique selling point, it also means that the market for these features is relatively small, and gaining adoption could take time.
One area where Dusk could differentiate itself is in the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs), but this sector comes with its own set of challenges. Legal frameworks, regulatory approvals, and institutional acceptance are all hurdles that Dusk will have to overcome. Although Dusk has partnered with NPEX, a regulated exchange in the Netherlands, to tokenize stocks and bonds on the blockchain, this remains an ambitious and complex task. Many projects have tried to tokenize RWAs before, but few have succeeded, so Dusk’s ability to deliver on this promise remains to be seen.
Marketing Efforts: Short-Term Attention, Long-Term Questions
Dusk has been promoting its platform through events like the Binance CreatorPad, offering over 3 million DUSK as a prize pool to encourage content creation. While this marketing campaign could generate some buzz, it’s unclear whether it will lead to sustained growth. The participation requirements are typical, requiring users to post with specific tags and trade $10 of DUSK. However, no matter how much money is spent on marketing, if the core product isn’t attractive, it will be hard to retain users and build an ecosystem.
Another concerning detail is the messaging around DuskEVM. The official Twitter account repeatedly states that DuskEVM is “about to go live,” even though the mainnet was already launched in 2025. This inconsistency suggests that the team may not be confident in the current state of the product or that it’s still in an incomplete phase. If the project’s own team isn’t fully confident in the product’s maturity, how can developers and users trust it?
The Price and Market Performance: Volatility and Liquidity Concerns
Dusk has seen a notable price increase recently, rising to $0.11 on January 17, with a 107% increase over the past seven days. While this is impressive, the project’s low market cap of just over $60 million and a circulating supply of 500 million DUSK make it highly susceptible to market manipulation. The liquidity pool is also quite small, making it difficult for investors to cash out without significant slippage. While the project may have room to grow if it can secure institutional clients or make progress in the RWA space, the risks of investing in such a low-market-cap asset are significant.
Developer Experience: A Steep Learning Curve
Another issue for Dusk is its decision to use a WASM virtual machine for executing privacy smart contracts, instead of directly using the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). While this choice may have its technical advantages, it creates a steep learning curve for developers, who must familiarize themselves with new tools and processes. Even though DuskEVM offers a compatibility layer for Solidity, parts of the privacy functionality still require the use of Dusk’s own SDK. This hybrid approach adds complexity and makes it harder for developers to build on the platform.
RWA Tokenization: A Great Idea, But Difficult to Execute
Dusk’s focus on RWAs is certainly promising, but it’s a highly complex area with many obstacles. Tokenizing traditional assets like stocks and bonds on the blockchain requires navigating a maze of legal and regulatory challenges. While Dusk’s partnership with NPEX may give it a head start, the road to widespread adoption will be long and difficult. If Dusk is unable to prove that it can successfully navigate these challenges, it risks becoming just another project with lofty ambitions but no real-world impact.
Conclusion: Potential But Many Hurdles Ahead
Dusk has a lot of potential with its unique approach to privacy and compliance, but it faces significant challenges. Its technical architecture is solid, but the lack of real-world usage, low TVL, and minimal community engagement are major red flags. If Dusk cannot turn its innovative technology into a thriving ecosystem, it may struggle to maintain momentum. The RWA sector remains an interesting long-term opportunity, but Dusk has a lot to prove before it can realize that vision. Until the team can overcome these hurdles, Dusk’s future remains uncertain.

When you think of privacy coins, the first thing that often comes to mind is complete anonymity, and that is usually a red flag for regulators. Most traditional privacy coins focus on providing full secrecy, but that comes at a cost when it comes to meeting legal and regulatory requirements. Dusk is trying to find a middle ground with its innovative use of zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), aiming to provide privacy while still being auditable by regulators. The key question is whether this technology can actually work and whether regulatory bodies will accept it. Let’s dive deeper into Dusk's approach to privacy and compliance and see if it has a shot at transforming the financial world.
Zero-Knowledge Proofs: The Heart of Dusk's Privacy
Zero-knowledge proofs are often talked about in theoretical terms, but what does it actually mean? Simply put, zero-knowledge proofs allow you to prove something is true without revealing the actual data. For example, if you want to prove that you have a certain amount of money or assets, you can use a zero-knowledge proof to verify that fact without showing the exact numbers or details. This helps ensure privacy while maintaining trust in the system.
Dusk uses two types of zero-knowledge proofs—zk-SNARKs and zk-STARKs. zk-SNARKs are smaller in size and offer quicker verification, but they require a “trusted setup,” which is a process where public parameters are generated in a secure manner. zk-STARKs, on the other hand, are more secure and don’t require this trusted setup. Both of these technologies are used to protect transaction details on the Dusk network, which is how the privacy aspect of the platform is maintained.
Dusk uses these technologies in its Phoenix protocol, which is designed to support privacy transactions on its network. Phoenix employs the same UTXO model as Bitcoin, but with a crucial difference: the transaction details are encrypted. This means the network knows a transaction took place, but no one can see who transferred funds to whom or how much was transferred. This is similar to how Zcash’s shielded transactions work, but Dusk has made tweaks to make it suitable for more complex smart contracts.
Public and Private Transactions: The Moonlight Protocol
Dusk’s design goes beyond just privacy. It also includes the Moonlight protocol, which allows for public transactions similar to Ethereum’s account-based model. With Moonlight, all transaction details are visible on the blockchain for everyone to see. This gives users the flexibility to choose between private or public transactions depending on their needs. It’s a nice touch, but it also brings challenges.
One of the key issues with having two different transaction models—Phoenix (private) and Moonlight (public)—is making sure the two are properly synchronized. Cross-mode transactions need to be secure, and there are complexities around ensuring these transactions happen smoothly. How do you maintain privacy when switching between these two modes? How can Dusk make sure the two systems don’t conflict with each other? These are important technical challenges that the team needs to address.
Citadel Identity: Privacy Meets Compliance
One of the standout features of Dusk’s privacy approach is its Citadel identity system, which combines privacy with compliance. Citadel allows users to prove their identity or compliance with regulations without revealing sensitive personal details. For example, a user can prove they’ve passed KYC (Know Your Customer) checks without revealing their name, address, or any personal history. Instead, they can simply prove that they are a resident of the EU, over 18, or not on any sanctions list, which is enough for regulatory compliance.
This system is a clever way to balance privacy with the requirements of financial regulators. But, as with any technology, it comes with its challenges. Generating zero-knowledge proofs for things like KYC checks can take time and computing power. In some cases, the proof generation can take seconds or even minutes, which could significantly slow down transactions. In high-speed environments like financial markets, delays like these could lead to missed opportunities, such as waiting too long to complete a stock trade.
Key Management: A Double-Edged Sword
Another issue with Dusk’s privacy approach lies in key management. The security of zero-knowledge proofs relies on the protection of private keys. If a user loses their private key, they not only lose access to their funds but also their identity credentials. In traditional finance, this might not be such a big deal because banks have mechanisms for recovering accounts. But in the world of crypto, if you lose your key, that’s it—there’s no way to recover your credentials.
This raises a critical question: does Dusk have a key recovery mechanism? If they do, it could compromise the privacy of the user, because allowing for recovery would involve some central authority having access to the key. If not, users may face significant problems if they lose their key, making the system less user-friendly, especially for those who are used to traditional banking systems.
Can Regulators Accept Dusk’s Privacy Solution?
The biggest hurdle for Dusk is whether regulatory agencies will accept its privacy solution. Zero-knowledge proofs are still a relatively new concept, and most regulators are more comfortable with traditional systems that allow them to access detailed transaction records. In Dusk’s case, regulators would have to trust the cryptographic algorithms and the proof-generation process, which may take some time for them to feel comfortable with.
Dusk claims to comply with the EU’s MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulations, but the details on how this compliance works are unclear. MiFID II (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive), for example, has stringent requirements around transaction reporting, market abuse, and best execution for securities trading. Does Dusk’s system allow for proper transaction reporting under MiFID II? How does it detect market manipulation? These are questions that remain unanswered.
One possible clue as to how regulators might respond lies in Dusk’s partnership with NPEX, a regulated exchange in the Netherlands. If NPEX is willing to use Dusk’s privacy features for issuing and trading securities, it might signal that regulators are open to the idea. However, NPEX is also applying for an exemption to use Distributed Ledger Technology for Securities Settlement (DLT-TSS), which could affect how Dusk’s role evolves in the future.
The Trusted Setup Issue: Is Dusk’s System Secure?
Another concern with Dusk’s privacy system is the trusted setup for zk-SNARKs. This is a process where cryptographic parameters are generated to secure the system, and if the setup is compromised, the entire security of the network could be at risk. Projects like Zcash have gone through a rigorous, transparent process to ensure that no one controls the setup keys. Has Dusk done something similar? If they have, is the process transparent enough to satisfy both the community and regulators?
Privacy Smart Contracts and Developer Ecosystem
Dusk has also introduced privacy smart contracts through its Dusk VM, which allows developers to write privacy-preserving logic in the Rust programming language. While this is a powerful tool for handling encrypted data, it comes with one major drawback: Dusk’s toolchain is not compatible with Ethereum’s Virtual Machine (EVM), which means developers can’t easily migrate their existing projects over to Dusk. This could make it harder for Dusk to attract developers to build on its platform.
While Dusk offers a DuskEVM layer to provide compatibility with Ethereum, it currently only supports public transactions. Developers who want to use privacy features must learn Dusk’s custom toolchain, which could limit adoption. In contrast, platforms like Aztec and Oasis offer more developer-friendly environments that make it easier to build privacy solutions.
Performance and Interoperability: The Road Ahead
Dusk’s approach to privacy-preserving transactions relies on the heavy use of zero-knowledge proofs, which can be computationally expensive to generate. While zk-SNARKs are fast to verify, generating them can take time. As the Dusk network grows and more privacy transactions are processed, this could lead to significant performance bottlenecks. What happens when the network is under heavy load? Can it scale effectively to handle a large number of transactions without slowing down?
@Dusk
Another issue for Dusk is interoperability. As an independent Layer 1 blockchain, Dusk needs to interact with other networks through cross-chain bridges. But privacy transactions complicate this. If the details of a privacy transaction are exposed on a cross-chain bridge, the whole point of privacy is lost. Dusk has not yet provided a solution to this problem, and until it does, its ability to integrate into the broader DeFi ecosystem could be limited.
#Dusk
Final Thoughts: Is Dusk Ready for the Future?
Dusk’s vision of auditable privacy using zero-knowledge proofs is innovative and could be a model for privacy in regulated financial environments. However, there are several obstacles that need to be overcome. Performance issues, key management challenges, regulatory acceptance, and a fragmented developer ecosystem are all hurdles that Dusk must address to make its vision a reality.
$DUSK
If Dusk can solve these problems, it could offer a compelling solution for privacy in the crypto space. But until it can prove that its technology works in real-world financial environments and gains the trust of regulators, it may remain an idea in progress. The future of Dusk depends on how well it can bridge the gap between cryptographic innovation and real-world application. Until then, it remains a project with great potential, but many unanswered questions.

Introduction
How Dusk Is Building Real Regulated Finance Infrastructure
For many years I have watched Dusk Foundation closely and the more I read and learn the more it becomes clear that this project is not like most in the crypto world. Dusk does not follow hype cycles or popular trends. It feels like a quiet engine working behind the scenes while the rest of the space is noisy with short lived stories. Dusk Foundation is focused on a single idea How do you build a public blockchain that institutions can trust without making every users financial life open for all to see That idea is at the heart of everything they do and it explains why Dusk feels so different from the usual layer one projects.
A Blockchain Built for Privacy and Compliance
Dusk Foundation is the organization behind the Dusk blockchain. It is a public layer one network created for privacy conscious and regulation aware financial applications. Its goal is to bring institutional grade assets to users while keeping compliance and user privacy in balance. The mission is not to replace existing financial systems but to improve them with stronger cryptography better settlement logic and a model that respects user privacy without breaking the rules banks brokers and regulated platforms already follow. Most blockchains focus only on transparency or only on privacy. Dusk tries to bring both worlds together. It gives users confidential transactions while letting the right authorities verify activity when the law requires it.
Privacy as a Core Feature Not an Afterthought
What makes Dusk stand out is how it treats privacy not as something optional but as a basic part of how the network works. The transaction system uses advanced zero knowledge proofs that let the chain confirm that transactions are correct without showing balances or transaction details publicly. The Rusk virtual machine gives builders the ability to include both compliance logic and privacy logic inside the same contract so developers do not have to choose one over the other. The identity framework allows selective disclosure so users keep their data private by default but can reveal exactly what is needed to the right party if a regulation demands it. Every part feels like it was designed for the real financial world not the purely experimental crypto environment.
DuskEVM and Developer Access
Another major direction for Dusk is DuskEVM which opens the door for millions of Solidity developers. It gives them a familiar way to build while benefiting from the privacy and compliance built into the chain. This is important because financial builders want environments that feel comfortable but also give them tools that satisfy regulators and protect users. DuskEVM moves Dusk into a more accessible space and makes the chain compatible with existing DeFi logic while adding privacy.
Years of Research and Live Mainnet Progress
The foundation has been working on this vision since 2018 and spent years in research and testnet phases before going live. When the mainnet arrived in early 2025 Dusk moved from being research heavy to a live protocol that supported staking real world asset issuance and confidentiality features right away. Instead of slowing down after launch the team kept pushing upgrades that improved performance added data availability layers strengthened settlement logic and moved DuskEVM toward a full live release. The pace of development shows that the foundation is not building a static blockchain but a growing financial infrastructure.
Real World Partnerships and Adoption
One of the strongest signs that Dusk is serious about real adoption is the partnership with NPEX a regulated Dutch stock exchange. This relationship is not for marketing alone. It is an effort to create a fully regulated security exchange running on Dusk technology for issuing and settling tokenized shares. When a blockchain becomes part of a regulated stock markets infrastructure it is no longer a speculative experiment it becomes a backbone. That is the direction Dusk Foundation keeps moving toward not hype but real markets.
Integration with Key Infrastructure Players
The ecosystem also connects with infrastructure partners like Chainlink to bring reliable off chain data into privacy aware environments. This matters for regulated products funds and securities because real world financial workflows need trustworthy data sources. Dusk’s approach is to make these connections secure private and ready for audit without putting users in a position where their trades balances or identity details become public forever.
How Dusk Solves Transparency and Regulation
This balanced approach is what separates Dusk from most projects talking about tokenization. Many chains talk about real world assets but still depend on transparent ledgers or simple permissioning that does not satisfy legal needs of institutional participants. Dusk solves the transparency problem by allowing private balances and confidential transactions and solves the regulation problem by enabling controlled disclosure when needed. It is not privacy against compliance or compliance against privacy it is both working together.
The Role of the DUSK Token
The DUSK token sits at the center of this system. It helps secure the network powers transactions incentivizes validators and enables features like liquid staking which allow more flexible participation. For institutions the token becomes a utility powering infrastructure for regulated assets. For everyday users it is the key to private transactions and privacy aware DeFi on DuskEVM and Rusk. As more real world financial products and tokenized securities begin to operate on Dusk demand for the underlying blockchain grows and the role of the token becomes stronger.
Looking Ahead to 2025 and 2026
Looking forward to 2025 and 2026 Dusk Foundation seems focused on scaling the network expanding DuskEVM strengthening partnerships around regulated markets and deepening the message around financial privacy. They are moving into a space where public blockchains become settlement engines for real institutions. If this transformation continues Dusk could become one of the first public chains built specifically for compliant financial infrastructure without sacrificing user confidentiality.
What makes this project matter is the shift it represents. The first era of crypto was about proving decentralization. The second era was about open finance and DeFi. The era Dusk is building toward is one where regulated markets tokenized securities institutions and everyday investors interact on a chain that respects both privacy and law. Dusk Foundation is shaping a future where cryptography regulation and real adoption finally meet in the same place.
@Dusk
#Dusk
$DUSK

@Walrus 🦭/acc
#Walrus
$WAL
In the world of Web3 people often look at apps tokens or how popular a project is but one thing gets overlooked the real reason some projects survive and others fail is trust in the data and the technology behind it Walrus is quietly solving this problem by providing a stable foundation that decentralized apps can rely on
Many projects in Web3 promise amazing things from smart contracts to NFTs games and decentralized finance platforms but when you look closer you see the gaps storage is often centralized or not secure data may not last long and if data access is interrupted apps crash and users leave Walrus is designed to fix this by creating an environment where data is always reliable and available
Walrus is more than just storage it is a guarantee that applications can keep running The network is built on the idea that the decentralized economy cannot grow if apps cannot fully trust their data It is designed to scale without compromising security while keeping data distributed and reliable over time Developers and users get real peace of mind knowing that applications will not fail because of technical issues
The presence of Walrus allows developers to build more complex apps without worrying about redesigns as they scale It turns data into an asset not a burden which is a big change in how people think about building Web3 projects Instead of focusing only on user experience apps can be designed around trust and reliability This opens the door for more innovation because developers know the foundation will not let them down
Walrus currency is also part of the trust mechanism It is not just for trading it motivates storage providers to perform well and commit to quality It brings economic stability to the system and ensures that growth in applications is reflected in the strength of the network Every token used in the network is linked to actual activity which increases confidence in the whole system pa
Integration with the Sui blockchain makes Walrus even more reliable and fast It allows developers to build apps that are flexible and can handle lots of users without slowing down It is not just about speed integration also improves trust because developers and users know the project can continue without interruptions
The market now is focusing on applications that are reliable and infrastructure that guarantees continuity Developers and users want to reduce technical risks Walrus comes at the right moment by providing a network that supports real applications which will remain stable and secure
By solving storage issues Walrus helps Web3 move from flashy promises to actual dependable platforms Applications can grow without worrying about losing data or downtime The network allows developers to focus on building better experiences while the underlying system handles continuity and trust
Walrus changes the way we think about Web3 from a temporary trend to a stable ecosystem It creates a silent backbone where apps can be built with confidence Data is protected scalable and available this makes it possible for apps to deliver long term value
The combination of reliable storage programmable data and economic incentives makes Walrus an essential part of Web3 Its role may not be visible like a token or interface but it underpins the entire system Every developer and user benefits from the stability and trust that Walrus provides
In conclusion Walrus is not about hype or short term growth it is about creating a foundation where decentralized apps can survive and thrive It gives developers the tools to build complex trustworthy applications it gives users confidence that their data is safe and it creates a stable network where growth is meaningful This hidden cornerstone is what Web3 needs to move from experiments to real world adoption

Governance in most networks does not always make big noise or sudden changes Instead effective governance works slowly step by step to fine tune how things work in the system It does not try to shock the users or break what is already working In the case of Walrus governance has taken this quiet steady route and it matters a lot for how WAL incentives are set and evolve with time
Walrus governance has focused on making small adjustments and using real operational data to improve the way WAL rewards are given out This means instead of making dramatic decisions that change the supply or shake up the economics of the token the team and governance community look at how the network is really used and what behaviors need encouragement or correction From this perspective governance becomes a kind of maintenance layer Always watching adjusting weights and shifting thresholds to fix inefficiencies that appear when the network is in live use
This approach helps minimize volatility that is caused just by governance decisions When people see governance acting quickly and harshly they often respond by changing their own behavior in unpredictable ways But when governance decisions are gradual based on real network use then participants get a sense of stability They can trust that incentives will remain consistent and that changes are made for real reasons not because of reaction or panic
Instead of changing supply dynamics or token emission models governance decisions in Walrus mainly center around understanding behavior and filtering good from bad performance This means rewards are given to those who show reliability and consistency over time Some nodes and participants are steady and always contribute to the health of the network Others might underperform or show risky patterns Governance uses this insight to adjust how incentives are weighted so that reliable actors get more benefits and unstable actors get fewer incentives or corrective signals
This steady governance style also makes Walrus different from systems that react quickly to short term trends Governance tries to make sure that changes are backed by data from actual usage of the network Instead of setting new rules based on guesses or trends outside the network the decisions come from watching how the network grows how nodes behave and how incentives drive actions This way the incentives align more closely with real contribution rather than speculation or short term gaming of the system
Over time the WAL token itself begins to reflect this governance philosophy This happens because WAL rewards are calibrated in a way that keeps long term alignment between contribution and compensation Governance always looks for fairness and predictability so participants know what to expect Their rewards grow when they act in ways that benefit the network Reliability is rewarded more than sudden risky gains or one time spikes in performance
The result of this governance model is that discipline is reinforced in the community Instead of reacting to every market signal or outside pressure the governance process helps the token economy evolve naturally with the network The token distribution and incentive rules grow right along with real network usage This makes the system more predictable and stable for participants at all levels from node operators to delegates
Governance actions in Walrus are not seen as dramatic events They are quiet refinements that build up over time and shape the incentives in a way that encourages good behavior and limits bad behavior Participants start to see that governance is not a source of chaos but a tool that ensures long term success The gradual nature of the changes makes it easier to plan and contribute with confidence
This way of managing incentives makes the network healthier and helps the WAL token find its place as a reliable unit of value within the ecosystem Instead of sudden spikes or drops caused by governance decisions WAL’s reward system adapts slowly and thoughtfully The adjustments happen because the governance has a clear view of what works well and what does not in terms of network operations
Governance is often described as a maintenance layer and that is exactly how Walrus treats it Governance patches weak spots small changes that add up over time They do not try to reinvent the wheel They do not introduce disruptive policies that take the community by surprise Instead they watch how the nodes perform look at the data and make small improvements that keep the system balanced and efficient
@Walrus 🦭/acc
By strengthening alignment between contribution and reward over time governance helps build trust in the token economy WAL becomes a representation of this steady philosophy Incentives are tuned so that the right people get rewarded the network stays consistent and participants know the game they are playing Governance has learned to adjust instead of overhaul This is how Walrus grows stronger with time
#Walrus
In simple terms Walrus treats governance like careful watch and refine process not a place for bold unpredictable moves This slow and steady method makes the ecosystem stable and helps the network attract participants who want to contribute over the long run Instead of reacting to every new trend Walrus governance looks at real network data responds with thoughtful adjustments and lets incentives evolve in a way that keeps the token economy growing without sharp shocks or disruptive changes
$WAL
In the end this governance philosophy makes Walrus different It makes WAL rewards dependable and predictable It helps create a system where contribution matters and where slow consistent improvements shape the economy without destabilizing expectations for the users and participants alike

When I first saw decentralized storage it was during a product task not a crypto pitch I had to move a few gigabytes of files images pdfs and versioned data that were just normal project bits Nothing fancy Nothing onchain Just real messy data Every real product has it That was when the truth hit me Blockchains are great at tracking ownership and settling rules But they are bad at holding the real stuff the actual media and documents of the digital world
That gap is exactly where Walrus starts to matter Walrus is not selling a dream of decentralization instead it is trying to make storage into real infrastructure something developers and businesses can rely on day after day predictable programmable resilient and built to scale This is the difference between talking about storage and actually building something you can run a business on
Walrus was made public by Mysten Labs in the middle of 2024 It is a decentralized storage and data availability protocol based around blob storage with Sui acting as the control layer The idea is simple Instead of creating a whole new blockchain just to coordinate storage Walrus uses Sui to handle lifecycle management incentives and governance and focuses its engineering on the storage network itself Mysten Labs positioned it as storage meant for large binary files not tiny onchain records
For traders and investors the real signal was timing and delivery Not fancy branding Walrus published its technical whitepaper in September 2024 that explained its design and efficiency thinking Later it also shared more formal research on arxiv in 2025 But the real milestone was the mainnet launch on March 27 2025 That is when the project moved from experimental claims into a live system where storage and retrieval were actually happening in production conditions
Now let us break down what is different here Most people think about decentralized storage in two ways Either you do full replication by storing many copies everywhere which is safe but costly Or you use cheap networks that are unpredictable and hard to reason about operationally Walrus chooses something in between It uses erasure coding to split data into many fragments and spread them across many storage nodes If some nodes go offline or behave badly the network can still reconstruct the original blob as long as enough fragments remain available The whitepaper explains this approach as a way to reach high resilience with lower overhead than full replication and to do it efficiently at a scale of hundreds of storage nodes
This idea sounds academic until you think about what really matters for real use Uptime durability and cost Stability If you are building anything that serves users NFT media game assets AI datasets legal documents financial records or social content you need confidence that files will not disappear links will not rot and costs will not randomly spike If a network needs way too much replication to be safe it becomes expensive fast If it is too fragile it becomes unusable for serious apps Walrus is built around that tradeoff keeping strong availability but also practical storage overhead
Another underappreciated part is programmability Walrus is not just a place to dump files It is building storage that can be referenced verified and interacted with in structured ways inside the Sui ecosystem This matters because the next wave of applications especially those near AI do not treat data as static They treat data as something that has rules pricing access patterns and lifecycle events Walrus places itself as enabling data markets where reliability and governability are features not afterthoughts
Now let us get practical Can it work at scale The Walrus SDK documentation shows a detail most marketing pages do not share Writing and reading blobs can require many requests On the order of about 2200 requests to write a blob and about 335 to read one in a direct node interaction pattern Though an upload relay can reduce write overhead This does not mean the system is broken It means Walrus is doing real distributed work under the hood fragmenting distributing certifying and reconstructing But it also reminds investors and builders that decentralized infrastructure has operational complexity and usability tooling is just as important as cryptography
Cost structure also looks like real infrastructure economics not DeFi vibes On Walrus mainnet storage involves two cost parts WAL token fees for storage operations plus SUI gas fees for onchain transactions coordinating lifecycle events Their documentation even shows a cost calculator and notes a key reality Small blobs can be disproportionately expensive because fixed per blob metadata costs dominate below certain sizes They mention around 64MB as a threshold in cost behavior That is the kind of constraint that shapes real product design and makes the network more investable because it is transparent
So why does Walrus matter now in 2026 rather than as another storage experiment Because decentralized storage is quietly becoming non optional AI apps need datasets and model artifacts Onchain games need asset permanence Tokenized finance needs document integrity and audit trails And social apps need resilient media hosting If these things depend entirely on centralized storage the decentralization claim collapses at the first subpoena outage or policy change
Walrus is one of the clearer attempts to solve that as a system not as a meme It uses a modern chain Sui for coordination not to reinvent governance It uses erasure coding not naive replication It has defined costs And it shipped mainnet on March 27 2025 My takeaway is simple Walrus is not interesting because it is decentralized It is interesting because it tries to make decentralized storage boring in the best way reliable enough that builders stop debating ideology and start treating it like a standard component And when infrastructure becomes standard value comes from usage not hype That is the real investment angle Walrus is not competing for narratives It is competing for permanence
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL