Jarbij

Andy666

正确的交易从来都不是天天赚麻

In this campaign,I am getting reward or noT,,plz coment..❤️❤️

Happy NeW year 2026____Start with a big blow🕯️🕯️

#binancetradingchlange

great

yes sir❤️❤️

super❤️❤️

#2025withBinance
V roce 2025 Binance dále pevně vytváří své postavení jako vedoucí globální burza kryptoměn, která nabízí inovativní řešení pro obchodníky a investory. S rychlým přijímáním technologie blockchain se Binance rozšířila mimo jednoduchý obchod, integrující produkty decentralizované finanční ekonomiky (DeFi), NFT a možnosti ukládání. Platforma zdůrazňuje bezpečnost, transparentnost a uživatelsky přívětivé rozhraní, čímž zpřístupňuje kryptoměny začátečníkům i odborníkům. Globální dosah Binance umožňuje plynulé transakce přes hranice, zatímco její vzdělávací iniciativy pomáhají uživatelům porozumět se vývoji kryptolandscape. S tím, jak se digitální aktiva stávají mainstreamovými, zůstává Binance na prvním místě, podporuje přijetí, inovace a finanční svobodu, čímž se rok 2025 stává významným rokem v růstu ekosystému kryptoměn.$BNB

加油

4

ANOTHER LOOS😢

BIG LOSS TODY😓

#BNBATH a $BNB Až dosud musel každý návrh na zlepšení Bitcoinu (BIP), který potřeboval kryptografické prvky, znovu vynalézat kolo. Každý z nich byl dodáván s vlastními vlastními Pythonovými implementacemi eliptické křivky secp256k1 a souvisejících algoritmů, které byly každé jemně odlišné od sebe. Tyto nekonzistence zaváděly tišší závazky a činily přezkoumání BIPs zbytečně složitým. Tento problém byl nedávno zdůrazněn v Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348 a je to něco, co alespoň hrstka vývojářů v komunitě vývoje Bitcoinu dlouho cítila: mělo by existovat jednotné, znovu použitelné standardní kryptografické BIP referenční kód secp256k1.
Minulý týden Jonas Nick a Tim Ruffing z Blockstreamu a Sebastian Falbesoner dosáhli velkého pokroku směrem k tomu. Jako součást jejich stávajícího návrhu ChillDKG tým uvolnil secp256k1lab. Nová, úmyslně NEBEZPEČNÁ Python knihovna pro prototypování, experimentování a specifikace BIP. Není určena pro produkční použití (protože není konstantní čas a je tedy náchylná k útokům na boční kanály), ale vyplňuje kritickou mezeru: nabízí čistý, konzistentní referenční rámec pro funkčnost secp256k1, včetně podpisů typu BIP-340 Schnorr, ECDH a aritmetiku polí/skupin na nízké úrovni. Cíl je jednoduchý: usnadnit a zpřístupnit psaní budoucích BIPs tím, že se vyhneme redundantním, jednorázovým implementacím. Pro autory BIP to znamená: méně vlastního kódu, méně problémů se specifikacemi a jasnější cestu od prototypu k návrhu.

#Plume $PLUME Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.

#Dolomite $DOLO
Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.

 #BounceBitPrime $BB Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.

#walletconnect $WCT Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.

  #Mitosis $MITO Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.

 #Somnia and $SOMI Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.