Delete Comment & Unfollowed if you found similar like these : - type $BTC but get $BTTC 😅 - type "Yes" but use empty space "Yes " 😂 - type as mentioned but still not works 🤣
These 💩people💩 are stepping your head to go on top
No matter how big 🎁 or small 🧧 respect the process in the right way ❤️
When we think of competition for @Walrus 🦭/acc , we name other cross-chain bridging projects. That's a mistake. The real, long-term competition is centralized exchanges (CEXs). For the average user, moving assets from Chain A to Chain B is often easiest by: sending to Binance/Coinbase -> selling -> withdrawing to new chain. It's a terrible user experience with multiple fees and tax events, but it's familiar and feels "safe." For $WAL to achieve mass adoption, @walrusprotocol must compete on the user experience trinity: Security, Simplicity, and Cost. · Security: Must be demonstrably as safe as a CEX (through audits and insurance) or safer (non-custodial). · Simplicity: The swap interface must be as easy as a CEX withdrawal. · Cost: Total fees must be consistently lower than the CEX deposit/trade/withdrawal combo. Winning against other decentralized protocols is step one. Winning the mindshare and trust of users who default to CEXes is the ultimate victory for the $WAL ecosystem. That's the mainstream adoption play. #walrus
#ETH🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 #Dusk/usdt✅ #bitcoin.” 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀The Simpsons predict Bitcoin is going to infinity.
Historically, predictions from the Simpsons have been insanely accurate.✨️✨️✨️✨️✨️ #BinanceHODLerBREV #CPIWatch {future}(BTCUSDT) {spot}(ETHUSDT) {future}(SOLUSDT)
When we think of competition for @Walrus 🦭/acc , we name other cross-chain bridging projects. That's a mistake. The real, long-term competition is centralized exchanges (CEXs). For the average user, moving assets from Chain A to Chain B is often easiest by: sending to Binance/Coinbase -> selling -> withdrawing to new chain. It's a terrible user experience with multiple fees and tax events, but it's familiar and feels "safe." For $WAL to achieve mass adoption, @walrusprotocol must compete on the user experience trinity: Security, Simplicity, and Cost. · Security: Must be demonstrably as safe as a CEX (through audits and insurance) or safer (non-custodial). · Simplicity: The swap interface must be as easy as a CEX withdrawal. · Cost: Total fees must be consistently lower than the CEX deposit/trade/withdrawal combo. Winning against other decentralized protocols is step one. Winning the mindshare and trust of users who default to CEXes is the ultimate victory for the $WAL ecosystem. That's the mainstream adoption play. #walrus
When we think of competition for @Walrus 🦭/acc , we name other cross-chain bridging projects. That's a mistake. The real, long-term competition is centralized exchanges (CEXs). For the average user, moving assets from Chain A to Chain B is often easiest by: sending to Binance/Coinbase -> selling -> withdrawing to new chain. It's a terrible user experience with multiple fees and tax events, but it's familiar and feels "safe." For $WAL to achieve mass adoption, @walrusprotocol must compete on the user experience trinity: Security, Simplicity, and Cost. · Security: Must be demonstrably as safe as a CEX (through audits and insurance) or safer (non-custodial). · Simplicity: The swap interface must be as easy as a CEX withdrawal. · Cost: Total fees must be consistently lower than the CEX deposit/trade/withdrawal combo. Winning against other decentralized protocols is step one. Winning the mindshare and trust of users who default to CEXes is the ultimate victory for the $WAL ecosystem. That's the mainstream adoption play. #walrus