青蛙也会飞

The comprehensive compatibility of DuskEVM has often been interpreted as a 'catalyst' for ecological expansion, with hopes that it will lead to an immediate influx of developers and a surge in projects. However, the reality presents a more subtle and profound picture: instead of a chaotic rush, it is a silent, paradigm shift based on deep understanding. This shift is bringing quality rather than just quantity to Dusk's ecological changes, and we are at the critical point of observing this qualitative change.
Signal 1: From 'Copying Projects' to 'Reconstructing Products' Developers
Early migrants mostly simply forked DeFi protocols from Ethereum to Dusk to test compatibility. However, recent activities indicate that more seasoned developers are doing something more valuable: redesigning the core logic of products based on Dusk's native privacy features. For example, a standard decentralized exchange (DEX) on Dusk is no longer just pursuing lower transaction fees but can be designed as a 'privacy order book' model, concealing large orders to avoid being targeted, while ensuring the authenticity of liquidity pool reserves through zero-knowledge proofs. This is no longer a simple migration but the creation of new product paradigms that cannot be achieved on transparent public chains, leveraging Dusk's unique endowments. This development activity may not immediately generate huge TVL, but it is nurturing differentiated and high-barrier ecological competitiveness.

In PoS consensus, validators obtain block rights and rewards by staking tokens, a process that is typically viewed as a closed on-chain economic cycle. However, DUSK's staking ecosystem is giving rise to a novel model prototype linked to the value of external real-world assets (RWA). This is not only an innovation in incentive mechanisms but may also become a bridge connecting on-chain security with off-chain asset value, redefining the essence of 'validator rights'.
In traditional models, the interests of validators (Stake) are entirely measured by the volatile prices of native tokens, with security guaranteed by the transfer of homogeneous crypto assets. But in Dusk's vision, what the network needs to secure in the future is the on-chain representation of company equities, bonds, or real estate shares valued in tens of millions to hundreds of millions of euros. At this point, what validators maintain is no longer a virtual network but a digital registration and settlement system carrying significant real-world value.

This article is the most popular one on Twitter recently, with over 100 million views. Musk also retweeted it. Share it with your brothers to learn together. If there is any infringement, please contact me, and I will take it down immediately.
The full text is as follows
If you’re like me, you find New Year’s resolutions to be silly.
Because most people change their lives in completely wrong ways. They make these plans just because others do — we have given this pursuit of status a superficial meaning — but these plans do not meet the requirements for real change. True change is much deeper than simply convincing oneself that this year will be more disciplined or efficient.

In the discussion of blockchain, we often fall into a kind of fanaticism for 'tool rationality': pursuing higher TPS, lower gas fees, and flashier interfaces, as if better tools alone could overturn the old world. However, the migration of the financial world, especially the entry of institutional funds, follows a completely different logic—'institutional rationality.' The primary concern is not 'how sharp this hammer is,' but rather 'is the use of this hammer compliant, is the risk controllable, and can responsibility be traced back?' The deepest value of Dusk is precisely the leap from the dimension of 'tool rationality' to constructing 'institutional rationality.'