David crypto BNB

I remember the first time I heard about Walrus. Back when decentralized storage was still something only the deepest corners of the internet whispered about, a few engineers were quietly dreaming of something bigger — a way to break the mold of traditional blockchains and cloud storage and make data both decentralized and truly usable. This wasn’t just about putting files somewhere and hoping they stayed safe; this was about empowering creators, developers, and everyday users to own their data without sacrificing performance or cost.
The idea began with a small group of builders within Mysten Labs, the team behind the Sui blockchain itself. These were people who had already poured years of their lives into solving impossible problems: how to make a blockchain fast, safe, and scalable. Somewhere along the journey, they realized that existing storage solutions — expensive cloud servers controlled by tech giants, or blockchain systems that were too slow and costly to be practical — weren’t enough for the future we were heading toward. They saw a world where massive AI datasets, high‑resolution videos, decentralized websites, and entire dApps could live on a decentralized network, and still be quick and reliable for end users.
So they started talking. They sketched ideas on whiteboards. They wrote long, late‑night emails about “erasure coding,” “blob storage,” and “proofs of availability.” I’m pretty sure there were evenings when the team sat around a screen, eyes tired, hearts still racing, convinced that they were building something that could change how the internet holds data. And that’s how Walrus was born — not in a boardroom with clipboards and suits, but in Slack channels and GitHub issues where engineers shared dreams and frustrations in equal measure.
In early 2025, that dream began to take shape in a very real way. The Walrus protocol was publicly announced as a decentralized storage platform built on the Sui blockchain, designed from day one to handle large files — what the team calls “blobs” — in a way that traditional blockchains simply can’t. Instead of storing every byte of data on the chain (which would be unbearably slow and costly), Walrus splits files into shards using an advanced algorithm called RedStuff, spreads them across a network of nodes, and keeps only compact proofs of availability on the Sui ledger. This means files can be reconstructed quickly and reliably even if many storage nodes go offline. It’s elegant, imaginative engineering. �
Binance Academy
The early months were anything but smooth. There were technical hurdles no one had fully solved before, and the team had to make choices that felt risky. How many shards were enough? How do you make sure nodes actually hold the data they tell you they do? What if the network grows faster than expected or doesn’t grow fast enough? Nights were long. I’m sure some of those first testnet runs felt like watching a suspense movie — half the time you were nervous something would break, and half the time you wondered if you were seeing the future.
But something beautiful started to happen. Early contributors began building with the protocol. Developers started hosting decentralized websites. Testnet users explored uploading videos and AI files. There were late‑night AMA sessions, community channels filling up with questions about how to stake tokens and support nodes. People began to care. That’s when I first felt it — this wasn’t just another tech project, it was becoming a community.
By early 2025, things really started to shift. Walrus announced a major private token sale that raised $140 million ahead of its mainnet launch, backed by heavy hitters like Andreessen Horowitz’s crypto arm (a16z crypto), Electric Capital, Franklin Templeton Digital Assets, and others. That wasn’t just money — it was a signal that people with serious skin in the game believed in this vision. �
Coindesk
When the protocol launched its mainnet in March 2025, it wasn’t a whisper — it was a moment. The WAL token began trading, and suddenly everyday users, not just developers and insiders, could participate. Traders, builders, holders, and curious newcomers all started interacting with the ecosystem in real time. Some were scared of volatility — as is always the case with new tokens — but others saw something deeper: a long‑term infrastructure play that could be bigger than simple DeFi hype.
So what is WAL, really? At its heart, it’s the native token that makes the entire Walrus network work.
When you upload data to Walrus, you pay for storage with WAL. That payment isn’t just tossed into a black hole — it’s distributed over time to the people running storage nodes, reflecting their participation in the network. WAL is also the currency of staking and governance. To become a storage operator, a node must stake WAL, which helps secure the network and ensures honest behavior. If a node fails to hold the data or answer availability challenges, it can be penalized — and that economic risk makes the whole system stronger. WAL holders can also vote on protocol upgrades and economic parameters, giving the community real influence over how things evolve. �
JuCoin +1
The tokenomics, as the team thoughtfully designed them, reflect both incentive alignment and long‑term sustainability. There is a maximum supply of 5 billion WAL tokens, and not all of them are in circulation yet. A big portion is reserved for the community, node incentives, and ongoing ecosystem development. Smaller portions are set aside for early investors and core contributors. This distribution was chosen carefully — the goal was to reward early believers and long‑term holders while ensuring there was enough supply to support real usage and incentives over many years. �
JuCoin +1
But it’s not just about burning and inflation mechanics. What makes this model feel human is that it rewards participation, not hoarding. People don’t get rewards just for sitting on tokens in a wallet; rather, they earn by staking and supporting the network’s operations. This gives long‑term holders a reason to stay engaged and aligned with the project’s success.
If you ask serious investors in this space what they’re watching, it’s not just price charts. It’s metrics like storage utilization — how much actual data is being stored on Walrus, how many developers are building on top of it, how many nodes are actively participating and proving availability, how smoothly governance processes are working, and how quickly costs per gigabyte are dropping relative to cloud alternatives. These numbers tell a story about real adoption and network health that price alone never captures.
We’re seeing early signs that those indicators are moving in the right direction. The community of builders is growing, third‑party SDKs and tools are emerging (even community‑built Flutter libraries to make it easy to integrate with mobile apps), and users are actively staking and uploading data. �
Reddit
Of course, it hasn’t all been smooth sailing. There have been moments of doubt, volatility, and confusion — like users accidentally swapping into the wrong token variant and losing money, reminding us that the crypto space is still wild and unforgiving for the unprepared. �
Reddit
Through all of this, what becomes clear is that Walrus is not just trying to be another token. It’s trying to be an engine — something that powers entire applications, something that real developers build with, something that stores things people care about. Whether it’s an AI training dataset, a decentralized website, or a piece of digital art, Walrus is trying to make decentralized storage practical and affordable for everyday use.
And that’s what makes this story feel hopeful.
Yes, there are risks. Everything about crypto is still experimental. Networks can fail. Token prices can swing wildly. Protocols can have bugs or governance disputes. But there’s also a very real possibility here: that decentralized storage, powered by visionary teams and actual community participation, becomes a backbone of the next generation internet — an internet that isn’t owned by a few corporations but shared by many.
When I look at WAL today, I don’t just see a token. I see a community that refused to be satisfied with the storage options we had. I see engineers who kept tinkering until their ideas became code. I see everyday users learning, engaging, and believing that the internet of tomorrow can be more fair, open, and resilient.
If this continues, Walrus might not just be a protocol in someone’s portfolio — it could be a building block for something much bigger
@Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus $WAL

When people look at Dusk today, it’s easy to see a polished layer 1 blockchain with strong ideas about privacy, compliance, and institutional finance. But what I’m seeing, when I trace the story back to the beginning, is something much more fragile and human. Dusk didn’t start as a token or a product. It started as a question that bothered its founders deeply: how can financial systems respect privacy without breaking the rules of the real world?

Back in 2018, the crypto space was loud, chaotic, and driven mostly by speculation. Privacy chains already existed, but they were often built in opposition to regulation, not alongside it. At the same time, banks, funds, and regulated institutions were curious about blockchain but scared of touching anything that couldn’t be audited. The founders of Dusk came from backgrounds in cryptography, engineering, and finance, and they were standing in the middle of this tension. They weren’t trying to build a rebel system. They were trying to build a bridge.

From day zero, the idea behind Dusk was uncomfortable for both sides. Hardcore crypto users questioned why anyone would care about compliance. Traditional finance players questioned why privacy was even necessary. This meant the team was building something without instant applause. They spent the early years doing heavy research, testing cryptographic proofs, and thinking deeply about how selective disclosure could work in practice. I’m seeing long periods where progress wasn’t flashy, but foundational. This is usually where many projects give up.

The early struggles were real. Privacy-preserving technology is hard. Zero-knowledge proofs are complex, expensive to compute, and difficult to explain to normal users. On top of that, building a layer 1 blockchain from scratch means making decisions that will live for years. Consensus design, virtual machine choices, cryptographic primitives, and network incentives all had to be aligned with one central vision: regulated privacy. Not partial privacy. Not fake compliance. Real privacy with real auditability.

Step by step, the technology took shape. Dusk introduced a modular architecture so different parts of the system could evolve without breaking everything else. They focused heavily on confidential smart contracts and transaction privacy, while still allowing regulators or authorized parties to verify activity when required. This balance is not accidental. It reflects years of debate, failed experiments, and refinements. You can feel that this system was built slowly, not rushed for hype.

While the code was maturing, something else was forming quietly. A community began to gather, not because of memes or quick profits, but because of shared belief. Developers interested in privacy tech. Investors who understood long timelines. Users who believed finance could be fairer without being lawless. I’m seeing how this kind of community grows differently. It asks harder questions. It leaves when answers are weak. It stays when progress is honest.

Real users didn’t arrive overnight. First came testnets, then early validators, then developers experimenting with tokenized assets and compliant DeFi models. Gradually, it became clear that Dusk wasn’t trying to compete with every blockchain. They were narrowing their focus. Tokenized real-world assets, regulated financial instruments, and privacy-first applications became the center of gravity. When institutions and serious builders started paying attention, it wasn’t because of price charts. It was because the infrastructure finally made sense.

The DUSK token sits at the heart of this system, not as a decoration, but as a working component. It is used to secure the network through staking, to pay for transactions, and to align incentives between validators, developers, and users. The tokenomics were designed with patience in mind. Inflation exists, but it serves a purpose: rewarding those who actively support the network. Stakers earn by helping secure consensus. Validators earn by staying honest. Long-term holders benefit as real usage grows, not just speculation.

What stands out to me is why the team chose this economic model. They didn’t want a system where early insiders dump on late users. They wanted a living economy where participation matters more than timing. Early believers are rewarded because they took risk when nothing was guaranteed. Long-term holders are rewarded because the system needs stability. If this continues, the token becomes less about trading and more about belonging to the network.

Serious investors don’t just watch the token price. They watch staking ratios, because high staking shows trust in the network. They watch validator distribution, because decentralization protects the system from capture. They watch developer activity, because code commits tell a more honest story than marketing. They watch real applications launching, especially those involving real assets and compliant finance. When these numbers grow steadily, it shows strength. When they stall, it raises hard questions.

Today, the Dusk ecosystem is still growing, and it’s doing so in a measured way. New tools, partnerships, and applications are forming around the core idea of compliant privacy. This isn’t explosive growth, but it is resilient growth. I’m seeing a project that understands its risks and doesn’t hide them. Regulation could change. Privacy tech could face new scrutiny. Competition is real. But there is also hope, grounded in something rare: clarity of purpose.

In the end, Dusk feels like a long conversation rather than a loud announcement. It’s a project asking whether we can build financial systems that respect human dignity without abandoning responsibility. There are no guarantees here. The road is slow, and the challenges are heavy. But if you’re watching closely, it becomes clear that this is not a story about chasing the next cycle. It’s about building something that still makes sense when the noise fades. And in a space that often forgets why it started, that alone feels worth paying attention to
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

Au tout début, Walrus n'était ni un jeton ni même un produit. Il a commencé comme un sentiment selon lequel quelque chose d'important manquait dans le monde décentralisé. J'observe un schéma que de nombreux créateurs précoce ont également remarqué : les blockchains devenaient plus rapides, le DeFi devenait plus bruyant, mais les données elles-mêmes restaient fragiles. Le stockage était coûteux, fragmenté et souvent dépendait de fournisseurs centralisés se cachant derrière une étiquette de « décentralisation ». L'idée derrière Walrus est née de cette frustration silencieuse. Les fondateurs, issus de solides expériences techniques dans les systèmes distribués et la recherche blockchain, n'avaient pas pour objectif la mode. Ils étaient des ingénieurs et des penseurs systémiques qui avaient passé des années à observer le comportement des données sous pression, la manière dont les réseaux échouaient, et la disparition de la confidentialité lorsqu'il y avait échelle. Ce qui revenait constamment, c'était une simple question : si les blockchains sont censées être sans confiance et résistantes à la censure, pourquoi les données sur lesquelles elles reposent restent-elles si faciles à contrôler ou à effacer ?

Quand les gens parlent de Dusk aujourd'hui, ils commencent souvent par ce qu'il est actuellement : une blockchain de couche 1 conçue pour la finance régulée, la confidentialité et les actifs du monde réel. Mais cela saute la partie qui compte le plus pour moi : l'histoire humaine derrière la naissance de cette idée, la raison pour laquelle elle était nécessaire, et comment elle a survécu assez longtemps pour devenir réalité.

L'idée de Dusk n'est pas apparue au cours d'un cycle de hype lié à un marché haussier. Elle a commencé à se former vers 2017 et 2018, à une époque où les blockchains étaient bruyantes, transparentes à l'excès et principalement déconnectées du monde financier réel. Les fondateurs observaient la même chose que beaucoup d'entre nous à cette époque : une innovation extraordinaire combinée à un désaccord complet entre les idéaux du crypto et la régulation du monde réel. Les blockchains publiques révélaient tout. Les banques et les institutions avaient besoin de confidentialité, d'auditabilité et de clarté juridique. Pourtant, la plupart des projets crypto agissaient comme si la régulation allait simplement disparaître. Il est devenu clair pour l'équipe de Dusk que, si la blockchain devait un jour soutenir une infrastructure financière sérieuse, il fallait construire quelque chose de fondamentalement différent.