TheBFMTimes

In termini semplici, Solana è progettata come una blockchain flessibile e multiuso, mentre Bitcoin è stato costruito per una singola funzione principale.
Filosofia di progettazione principale
Solana rappresenta una nuova generazione di blockchain incentrate sulla velocità, sulla scalabilità e sullo sviluppo di applicazioni. Bitcoin, al contrario, è stato creato principalmente come un sistema di denaro digitale peer-to-peer, con funzionalità limitate al trasferimento di valore.
Modello di consenso
Solana funziona su un framework Proof-of-Stake. I validatori devono bloccare una quantità significativa di SOL per partecipare alla convalida delle transazioni e guadagnare ricompense. Questo sistema è energeticamente efficiente e funziona tipicamente su hardware di consumo o aziendale ad alte prestazioni.

Come viene calcolata la tassa sulle criptovalute?
La tassa sulle criptovalute viene calcolata sul reddito non dichiarato o non dichiarato, indipendentemente dal fatto che venga trattato come reddito personale o plusvalenze.
In condizioni normali, i profitti derivanti dalle transazioni di criptovalute sono tassati a un tasso fisso del 30%, indipendentemente da eventuali perdite subite nello stesso esercizio finanziario. Le perdite non possono essere compensate con i guadagni.
Tuttavia, quando il reddito da criptovalute non viene dichiarato, si applica una sanzione significativamente più elevata.
Esempio:

Se hai guadagnato 5.000 ₹ in profitti da criptovalute nel 2023, il debito fiscale standard sarebbe di 1.500 ₹ al tasso del 30%. Ma se questo reddito non è stato dichiarato, l'imposta dovuta aumenta a 3.500 ₹, pari al 70% del reddito totale da criptovalute.

Common Trading Pitfalls to Avoid
Greed
Many traders allow profitable positions to run longer than planned in pursuit of marginal gains. This mindset has no natural stopping point. When markets reverse, unrealized profits often disappear, or winning trades turn into losses.
The most effective way to control greed is to define exit levels in advance. Setting clear take-profit targets before entering a trade removes emotional decision-making when prices move quickly.
Fear
Fear surfaces when traders become overly focused on protecting short-term gains or react to market noise and FUD. This often results in premature exits, cutting strong trades before trends have fully played out.
Traders should rely on structure rather than sentiment. Exits should occur only when technical trends break or when price moves beyond a predefined stop-loss level.
Negligence
Entering trades without proper confirmation is a common mistake. Relying on a single indicator or acting on incomplete information increases the risk of false breakouts and failed setups. These errors frequently lead to avoidable losses.
Using multiple indicators and understanding broader market context improves accuracy and reduces impulsive decisions. Strong foundational knowledge is critical before risking capital.
Recklessness
Early success can create a false sense of confidence. After a few winning trades, beginners often assume markets are predictable and begin increasing position sizes aggressively. This behavior usually ends in outsized losses.
Each trade should be treated independently, with risk calibrated to current market conditions rather than past outcomes. Consistency matters more than speed.
Following the Crowd
Many traders blindly follow peers, influencers, or self-proclaimed experts. However, every trader operates with different strategies, risk tolerance, and psychology. A setup that works for one participant may fail for another.
Developing personalized indicators, rules, and execution frameworks is essential before committing real capital.
Emotional Discipline
Emotions influence every trading decision. Controlled emotions support discipline, while poor emotional regulation leads to inconsistent entries, ignored stop-losses, and impulsive exits.
Building a strong trading mindset takes time. Practicing in simulated environments and refining decision-making processes helps traders maintain control when real money is on the line.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can traders avoid catching a falling knife?

A falling knife describes buying an asset during a sharp decline. Traders can avoid this by respecting dominant trends and waiting for clear confirmation before entering positions.
What is the 3-5-7 rule in trading?

The 3-5-7 rule limits risk by capping losses at 3% per trade, keeping total portfolio risk under 5%, and targeting a minimum reward-to-risk ratio of 7:1.
Disclaimer:

BFM Times provides information strictly for educational purposes. The content does not constitute financial advice. Always consult a qualified financial professional before making investment decisions.

The Fastest Route to Wealth in Crypto
In practical terms, building a crypto-native business remains the most reliable path to achieving millionaire status in the digital asset space.
What Defines a Crypto Millionaire?
A crypto millionaire is anyone who has generated at least $1 million in net worth directly from crypto-related activities. This includes wealth earned through founding or scaling crypto businesses, early-stage investments, trading, token launches, or even substantial rewards such as airdrops.
Well-known figures such as Changpeng Zhao, Justin Sun, and even public figures like Donald Trump and Melania Trump fall into this category due to direct crypto exposure and earnings.
Importantly, individuals who earn significant income in other industries and later deploy that capital into crypto can still qualify-provided the crypto component alone exceeds the $1 million threshold. However, this definition excludes those whose primary wealth was created outside crypto and merely parked into digital assets later.
The Most Realistic Way to Become a Crypto Millionaire
Despite popular narratives, trading and passive investing rarely produce consistent millionaires due to high failure rates and market volatility. The highest-probability path is entrepreneurship.
Launching crypto-focused ventures-such as blockchain development companies, token-based protocols, NFT platforms, cross-chain bridges, liquidity infrastructure, or crypto investment vehicles-offers asymmetric upside and direct exposure to value creation. This approach aligns wealth generation with innovation rather than speculation.
How to Build a Viable Crypto Startup
A crypto startup should ideally be incorporated in a jurisdiction with regulatory clarity and low operational friction. Regions like the UAE provide a favorable environment due to progressive digital asset policies and reduced compliance uncertainty.
To scale quickly and move toward a seven-figure founder valuation, a startup must meet several strategic criteria:
It must address a real structural problem, such as scalability limitations, excessive centralization, capital inefficiency, or financial risk.It should operate in a niche with limited direct competition.Pricing must be competitive, as many crypto verticals are already dominated by well-funded incumbents.The business model should remain resilient against foreseeable regulatory changes, including stricter KYC or compliance mandates.It should not depend entirely on the success, survival, or narrative momentum of another protocol or company.What You Need to Launch Your Own Crypto Project
Regardless of geography, establishing a crypto company requires a foundational setup that investors expect:
Valid passports or national IDs of all co-founders.Proper incorporation documents, including registration certificates and clarity on tax treatment-especially if equity or tokens are issued.At least one co-founder with deep technical expertise in blockchain or crypto development.At least one co-founder with hands-on crypto-native marketing and growth experience.A functional, credible website.A working Minimum Viable Product suitable for investor or partner demos.
A Shortcut Many Builders Overlook
One of the most efficient entry points into the crypto startup ecosystem is participating in well-funded hackathons. These events often provide direct access to grants, early-stage capital, ecosystem partnerships, and accelerated visibility-dramatically shortening the path to funding.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many crypto millionaires exist today?

CNBC estimates that there were approximately 241,700 crypto millionaires globally by late 2025.
Would investing $1,000 in Bitcoin five years ago make someone a crypto millionaire?

No. In 2020, Bitcoin traded near $9,250. A $1,000 investment would have yielded roughly 0.1 BTC, which would be worth around $45,000 in 2026. Reaching millionaire status would have required an initial investment closer to $22,000.
Which cryptocurrencies do major billionaires hold?

Elon Musk has publicly acknowledged holding Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin.

Disclaimer:

BFM Times provides information strictly for educational purposes and does not offer financial advice. Readers should consult a qualified financial professional before making any investment decisions.

The attackers appeared to be highly selective, prioritising psychological manipulation over sophisticated technical exploits. Instead of relying on complex malware, they exploited trust, routine, and human error.
Related: North Korean hackers linked to crypto theft via fake Zoom meetings
UK Retailers Hit by a Coordinated Cybercrime Campaign
A wave of coordinated cyberattacks recently swept through major UK retailers, with several high-profile brands suffering significant operational and financial damage during the Scattered Spider campaign.
Among the hardest hit were Marks & Spencer, The Co-operative Group, and Harrods. UK authorities confirmed that the group deployed DragonForce ransomware as a pressure tactic to extract leverage from victims.
In July, law enforcement arrested four suspects, all of whom were teenagers. The arrests highlighted a growing reality: modern cybercrime rings are increasingly young, decentralised, and alarmingly well-organised.
The financial impact was severe. Marks & Spencer estimated losses of roughly £300 million, while the Co-op disclosed revenue losses amounting to £206 million.
Inside the Marks & Spencer Breach
During a UK Parliament committee session, M&S chairman Archie Norman confirmed that the attack followed known Scattered Spider playbooks and involved DragonForce ransomware. He declined to confirm whether a ransom payment was made.
According to Norman, the breach began with social engineering and was compounded by a third-party supply chain weakness. Stolen credentials linked to Tata Consultancy Services played a role in enabling access.
Rather than engaging directly with the attackers, M&S chose to work through specialist intermediaries. The consequences were extensive. Online ordering was suspended for months, and core systems had to be rebuilt almost entirely from scratch.
Why the Co-op Bounced Back Faster
Although the Co-op was also compromised, its recovery was significantly quicker. Stock availability normalised by late May, and most stores resumed full operations by June.
Speaking at the Financial Times Cyber Resilience Summit, MP Alison Griffiths attributed the difference to contrasting technology strategies. The Co-op had already progressed far in moving away from legacy infrastructure, with cloud migration well underway.
This modernisation limited attackers’ ability to operate inside internal systems and sharply reduced recovery time. In contrast, M&S’s slower transition meant system restoration took close to four months, giving attackers a longer window to inflict damage.
Why Retailers Remain Prime Targets
Retail remains one of the most attractive sectors for cybercriminals. Large workforces increase exposure, and M&S alone employs around 50,000 people, expanding the attack surface dramatically.
Retailers also store high-value data, including payment information, consumer behaviour insights, and sensitive internal records. According to Kroll’s Brent R. Tomlinson, the sector is a “target-rich environment,” where outdated systems and constrained security budgets remain common.
The Bigger Lesson
The Scattered Spider incidents exposed uncomfortable truths for the UK and beyond. Cybersecurity is not purely a technical problem. Human behaviour, infrastructure decisions, and organisational readiness play an equally critical role.
Faster cloud adoption reduced downtime, while better coordination and information sharing improved response effectiveness. The message is clear: resilience is built long before an attack begins.
Disclaimer: BFM Times provides information strictly for educational purposes and does not offer financial advice. Readers should consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

More than $3.4 billion in cryptocurrency was stolen over the past year, with North Korea-linked hackers accounting for nearly $2 billion of that total. The figures highlight a clear shift in crypto crime dynamics, where attackers are executing fewer operations but targeting far larger payouts.
North Korea Drives Record Crypto Losses
Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis estimates that North Korean actors stole approximately $2.02 billion in crypto, marking a 51% increase compared to the previous year. This surge has pushed cumulative losses attributed to the country to nearly $6.75 billion.
Although the overall number of attacks declined, the financial impact rose sharply due to a small number of high-value breaches. One incident alone-the February 2025 hack of Bybit-resulted in losses of around $1.5 billion, significantly skewing annual totals.
Service providers bore the brunt of these losses, as centralised platforms experienced rare but devastating private-key compromises that drained funds within minutes. By early December, industry-wide crypto losses had already surpassed $3.4 billion, with North Korea-linked groups responsible for the majority of the damage.
Bigger Hacks, Fewer Incidents
Data shows an expanding gap between typical hacks and extreme outliers. Last year, the largest single breach exceeded the median loss by more than 1,000 times-an unprecedented divergence.
Chainalysis reports that just three attacks were responsible for 69% of total service-provider losses. While smaller incidents continue to occur, their financial impact has become marginal compared to these major breaches. Since 2022, North Korea-linked thefts have consistently clustered at the highest value ranges, whereas other criminal groups tend to execute a broader mix of smaller attacks.
Distinct Laundering Behaviour
North Korean hackers also display unique laundering strategies. Rather than moving funds in large blocks, they typically split transfers into amounts below $500,000, a tactic that contrasts with other groups and helps analysts identify behavioral patterns.
Cross-chain bridges have played a key role in these operations, with platforms such as Celer and Stargate frequently used to shift assets between networks. Notably, these actors interact less with decentralised exchanges, lending protocols, and peer-to-peer platforms than other cybercriminals.
Retail Wallet Thefts Rise
While state-linked hacks dominate headlines, individual users remain highly exposed. Wallet compromise incidents climbed to roughly 158,000-nearly triple the levels seen in 2022. The number of unique victims rose to at least 80,000, driven partly by broader crypto adoption.
Despite the higher victim count, total losses from personal wallet theft fell to $713 million, down from $1.5 billion the previous year. This suggests attackers are targeting more users but extracting smaller amounts per victim.
Solana recorded the highest number of affected users, while Ethereum and Tron showed the highest theft rates relative to active wallets.
A Changing Threat Landscape
This year’s data points to a more calculated approach to crypto crime. Hackers are demonstrating greater patience, coordination, and selectivity-executing fewer attacks but achieving record-breaking losses when they strike.
Crypto crime has not faded. It has evolved. Understanding these shifting patterns may be critical to preventing the next wave of large-scale breaches.
Disclaimer: BFM Times provides information strictly for educational purposes and does not offer financial advice. Readers are advised to consult a qualified financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Per mesi, i partecipanti al mercato hanno supposto che la conclusione della lunga controversia legale tra Ripple e le autorità statunitensi avrebbe aperto la strada a un rialzo ininterrotto di XRP.
Quell'ottimismo non si è ancora concretizzato. Il token ha avuto difficoltà a mantenere la spinta sopra il livello di 2 dollari, e nonostante più di 1,4 miliardi di dollari siano entrati negli ETF a contanti su XRP, l'andamento del prezzo rimane bloccato da una resistenza persistente. Invece di accelerare al rialzo, XRP sembra bloccato in un intervallo ristretto e fragile.
Prospettive sul prezzo di XRP in vista del nuovo anno

Il mercato dei NFT è entrato in una fase decisiva di riassetto. Man mano che si svolge il nuovo anno, i dati blockchain rivelano che sono stati ora emessi più di 1,34 miliardi di NFT su reti principali, un livello senza precedenti di offerta che si contrappone in modo netto all'attività degli acquirenti in calo.
Nonostante i livelli record di emissione, la partecipazione degli investitori continua a diminuire e il fatturato totale delle vendite rimane sotto pressione. Questo solleva una domanda fondamentale: il settore NFT sta raggiungendo il suo termine, oppure semplicemente sta evolvendo?
Il rallentamento dei NFT e il percorso futuro