Top 7 Dự Án Có Quy Mô Buyback Token Lớn Nhất Trong 30 Ngày Qua
Hoạt động mua lại token (token buyback) đang quay trở lại tâm điểm chú ý của thị trường crypto nhưng lần này không phải nhờ câu chuyện thổi phồng, mà đến từ dòng tiền thực và doanh thu thật của các giao thức.
Trong 30 ngày gần nhất, nhiều dự án đã sử dụng lợi nhuận để mua lại token với tổng giá trị lên tới hàng chục triệu USD, qua đó tạo ra mối liên kết trực tiếp giữa hiệu quả hoạt động của giao thức và giá trị dành cho holder.
🏆 Dẫn đầu là Hyperliquid $HYPE
$53.3 triệu USD token được mua lại Tương đương ~0.22% tổng cung Hyperliquid đang cho thấy sức mạnh của một mô hình giao dịch phái sinh có doanh thu cao, với buyback đều đặn và quy mô lớn, phản ánh dòng tiền thực sự bền vững.
🚀 Các dự án theo sau Pump.fun $PUMP : $22.7M (~0.91% nguồn cung) Aster $ASTER : $20.8M (~0.35%) Bonk $BONK: $18.9M (~1.93%)
Đáng chú ý, không chỉ các giao thức DeFi “truyền thống”, mà cả hạ tầng memecoin như Pump.fun hay Bonk cũng đang tạo ra lợi nhuận đủ lớn để triển khai buyback ở quy mô đáng kể.
🌱 Nhóm còn lại Sky ($SKY): $6.25M Meteora ($MET): $5.94M (~2.25%) Jupiter ($JUP): $4.99M
Dù giá trị tuyệt đối thấp hơn, nhưng một số dự án trong nhóm này lại có tỷ lệ buyback trên tổng cung khá cao, cho thấy cam kết mạnh mẽ với việc gia tăng giá trị dài hạn cho token. ăng sẽ nhận được sự quan tâm lớn hơn từ nhà đầu tư dài hạn.
Learn more abotu @Walrus 🦭/acc Walrus - A native cryptocurrency token
Walrus (WAL) is a native cryptocurrency token used within the Walrus protocol, a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform that focuses on secure and private blockchain-based interactions. The protocol supports private transactions and provides tools for users to engage with decentralized applications (dApps), governance, and staking activities.
The Walrus protocol is designed to facilitate decentralized and privacy-preserving data storage and transactions. It operates on the Sui blockchain and utilizes a combination of erasure coding and blob storage to distribute large files across a decentralized network. This infrastructure is intended to offer cost-efficient, censorship-resistant storage suitable for applications, enterprises, and individuals seeking decentralized alternatives to traditional cloud solutions.
The WAL token serves multiple functions within the protocol. Users pay for data storage using WAL, and node operators are rewarded in WAL for maintaining uptime and reliability. Additionally, WAL can be staked by token holders to participate in the governance of the protocol, which includes voting on system upgrades and economic decisions. Token staking also enables users to receive rewards for contributing to network security.
How @Walrus 🦭/acc Fits Into the Broader Web3 Infrastructure Stack
Web3 infrastructure consists of multiple layers, including networks, execution environments, and data storage. Walrus focuses on strengthening the storage layer by providing decentralized solutions designed for modern blockchain needs. This complements other infrastructure components rather than competing with them.
By addressing data availability challenges, Walrus supports a wide range of decentralized use cases. As applications generate more data, storage-focused protocols become increasingly relevant. Understanding the purpose of $WAL AL helps illustrate how different infrastructure layers work together to support Web3 growth.
Governance is one of the most powerful ideas in DeFi — but also one of the least used. Bifrost has just introduced a proposal that directly addresses this problem: Should active governance participation be rewarded with real economic incentives? As someone who follows DeFi closely — especially the Polkadot ecosystem — I think this proposal is an important step forward, not just for Bifrost, but for on-chain governance design in general. Let’s break it down in simple terms. The Core Problem: Governance Is Undervalued Right now, governance on many DeFi protocols (including Bifrost) faces a few common issues: Many BNC / vBNC / bbBNC holders don’t clearly know where or how to vote There’s often strong discussion, but low actual voting turnout Governance feels like a “responsibility” rather than a rewarded action At the same time, Bifrost has entered a new phase focused on buybacks and profit sharing. That makes governance even more important — because decisions now directly affect long-term value. So the question becomes: How do we turn passive token holders into active protocol participants?
The Proposal: Incentivize Governance Participation Bifrost is asking the community to choose one of two incentive models, via on-chain voting. 👉 You vote AYE on the option you support, and NAY on the other. 👉 The winning option will be implemented. Option A: Governance Participation Affects bbBNC APY 🔗 Referendum: https://bifrost.subsquare.io/referenda/189 How it works (simplified): If you actively participate in governance, your bbBNC APY increases If you stay inactive, your yield may be lower Governance becomes part of the core yield logic, not a side activity Key characteristics: Long-term, structural incentive Strong alignment between governance and economic value Requires on-chain upgrades and more development time (≈ 6 months) Option B: Governance Participation Earns Lottery Tickets 🔗 Referendum: https://bifrost.subsquare.io/referenda/190 How it works (simplified): Each governance action earns lottery tickets Periodic draws distribute rewards from a prize pool More participation = more chances to win Key characteristics: Fast to launch (≈ 2 months) No on-chain logic changes required Flexible campaign-style incentives Rewards are probabilistic, not guaranteed UX Improvements (Regardless of Option) No matter which option wins, Bifrost will upgrade its governance UX: Clear proposal list with voting stats One-click participation using BNC / vBNC / bbBNC Transparent display of voting status and lock conditions Depending on the chosen option, users will also see: APY impact dashboards (Option A), or Lottery pages with tickets, pools, and draw info (Option B) This is already a big win for accessibility. My Personal Take as a DeFi & Polkadot Content Creator Both options are valid — but they serve different goals. Why Option B Makes Sense Short-Term If the goal is: Quick participation boost Low technical risk Immediate feedback on incentive effectiveness 👉 Option B is very practical. Lottery-style rewards are familiar in crypto and can attract casual users who normally ignore governance. Why I Personally Lean Toward Option A From a long-term protocol design perspective, I find Option A more compelling. Why? It treats governance as productive work, not a game It aligns yield, ownership, and responsibility It encourages consistent participation, not one-off actions It strengthens bbBNC as a “governance-aligned asset” Yes, it’s more complex and slower to ship — but structurally, it’s closer to what mature DeFi governance should look like. If Bifrost wants governance to be a core pillar, not a marketing campaign, Option A sets a stronger foundation.