$DGC After the heavy sell-off over the past days, DGC is showing a clear recovery. In three days, the next token unlock is scheduled. The associated supply risk is real, well known, and already part of the market’s calculation.
That’s exactly why the current move matters. The rebound doesn’t have a single trigger. It is likely a combination of:
- loyal holders who didn’t capitulate
- new participants who see the sell-off as overextended
- a technical rebound after extreme downside pressure
- a noticeable reduction in selling pressure
This is not a hype-driven move. It’s a phase where it becomes visible whether a project is supported or abandoned once the easy decision — selling — is behind us.
The real test starts now. Not the bounce itself, but whether DGC can hold this level through the upcoming unlock. If it does, that would be a first signal of resilience. Not a confirmation of strength — but progress.
For me, DeGPT.ai remains the core of the thesis. There is a real product, real usage, and actual traction — not just promises. That said, realism matters:
- tokenomics remain a structural risk
- volatility is still to be expected
-trust takes time to rebuild after a sell-off
That’s exactly why conviction matters more than short-term price action. I’ve made my decision. I’m holding my position and I used the sell-off to increase my DGC allocation.
$DGC The recent sell-off in DGC is obvious and should be viewed rationally. One likely trigger is the potential token unlock on Jan 20, which typically creates short-term selling pressure. Beyond that, there are several realistic possibilities: sales by large holders, liquidity raised by the team to fund upcoming steps, or market maker activity — assuming they are still involved. Without full on-chain visibility or internal data, none of this can be stated with certainty. Even solid analysis won’t provide a 100% clear answer.
What is clear, however, is that DGC’s token structure amplifies volatility. A very large total supply combined with a relatively low circulating supply means that uncertainty, unlock events, or sentiment shifts can move the price aggressively, regardless of short-term changes in fundamentals.
Long-term holders tend to look past this noise. The real question is not short-term price action, but whether DeGPT.ai delivers real utility and can establish itself within the AI and DePIN landscape. For those who believe in the product and its long-term relevance, current price levels are not irrational — they are structurally interesting.
This remains a high-risk environment. Risk is not an exception here; it’s part of the equation. Everyone has to decide what they can tolerate. Personally, I’m holding my position and gradually rebuilding my DGC stack.
Then wait and watch. If you believe it’s going to zero, feel free to sell.
Jumbo Jack
--
$DGC The current sell off in DGC is significant and not surprising. The market is already pricing in the fact that another 32.95B DGC will be unlocked on January 20th. This increase in circulating supply can create additional short-term selling pressure, so further downside is entirely possible. Anyone involved should be aware of these facts and make a rational decision: hold, accumulate, or reduce exposure — all valid choices if based on analysis.
If you believe in the project, you hold or buy. If every red candle makes you panic, you should probably sell and get some peace of mind.
$DGC The current sell off in DGC is significant and not surprising. The market is already pricing in the fact that another 32.95B DGC will be unlocked on January 20th. This increase in circulating supply can create additional short-term selling pressure, so further downside is entirely possible. Anyone involved should be aware of these facts and make a rational decision: hold, accumulate, or reduce exposure — all valid choices if based on analysis.
If you believe in the project, you hold or buy. If every red candle makes you panic, you should probably sell and get some peace of mind.
$DGC The Telegram channel has been unmanageable for a long time. Repeated disruptions—spam and irrelevant posts—are eventually deleted by the team, but the disruptors remain in the chat. This makes it virtually impossible for new members to participate meaningfully.
At this point, joining the Telegram channel simply does not make sense. Until the channel is cleaned of all disruptors, I can only recommend using other information channels. This does not mean that the DeGPT product is bad—only that the Telegram channel is poorly managed. Immediate and decisive action is required to restore the channel’s quality and usability.
$DGC One key topic remains unresolved: HTTP 402. As the mechanism enabling direct pay-per-use access to services and APIs, it sits at the core of the overall concept.
So far, there has been no clear statement from the team, which naturally raises questions. This is not a minor detail — it’s a structural challenge.
A lot depends on whether and how this is addressed. Without a functional HTTP-402 layer, long-term viability will be difficult, simply because too much relies on it.
That said, this is exactly the point where execution matters most. If the team delivers a clean and scalable solution, sentiment can shift quickly. Risk is real — but so is the upside.
$DGC Almost every trading pair is in the green right now — except DGC, which is clearly moving against the broader market trend.
Is the selling pressure driven by the upcoming token unlock of 31.95B DGC on January 20?
Trading volume has dropped again after a noticeable spike a few days ago, suggesting hesitation rather than sustained buying interest. Short term, this doesn’t look great — no sugarcoating that.
However, if the unlock is absorbed smoothly and volume returns, momentum can shift quickly. Patience is still the key here.
$DGC / DeGPT.ai is still early — and that’s exactly when the right questions matter most.
The foundation is there. The product exists. Users are testing. Now the key question: what’s next?
How scalable is decentralized GPU infrastructure in practice, can costs stay competitive over time, and how effectively can DGC attract and retain both Web2 and Web3 users?
Early phases aren’t about hype. They’re about execution and direction. Sometimes the most important move is simply the next one.
Is it the next technical milestone? Is it deeper product usage that creates sustainable demand? Or the next step that turns existing progress into real scale?
A lot has already been delivered. Now the focus is on what comes next — and which move will have the biggest impact.
$DGC Progress comes from execution. A key factor remains the HTTP 402 implementation. It’s the foundation for real usage, pay-per-use, and sustainable monetization. That’s why the community is watching this so closely.
What stands out positively: the team listens. Constructive criticism is acknowledged, not ignored.
One visible example is trading volume. After valid concerns around activity and Alpha relevance, 24h volume increased from around $18k to over $120k. That doesn’t happen by accident.
This doesn’t mean everything is finished especially with #402 - execution is what matters. But one thing is clear: feedback leads to action.
That’s how trust is built. If this approach continues, real momentum can emerge from product, usage, and community.
Most AI today runs on centralized GPU clusters. Powerful, but expensive, region-locked, and controlled by a few providers.
DeGPT.ai is built around a different model:
- Compute comes from global idle hardware, not a few data centers
- Supply scales organically with demand
- Prices are driven by competition, not monopolies
- No single point of failure
- Access reaches regions outside the Western cloud stack
Centralized GPUs scale AI for corporations. DeGPT.ai + decentralized GPUs scale AI for the world. That’s how AI moves from a privilege to global infrastructure. #DGC #DeGPT #AI #DecentralizedAI #AIInfrastructure
Yes, there have been delistings on other CEX, which caused some concern. But there’s no reason to panic. In this early phase, Binance Alpha is key – other CEX are expensive and only provide short-term reach.
What truly matters is the product: active users, real usage and the implementation of #402 – pay-per-use, micropayments, automated agents. Without this, any listing is just a name.
Past delistings show that listings alone don’t move the needle. Community, usage and 402 implementation are the foundation. Other CEX will address DGC at the right time. Focus your energy on product, users and community – not headlines.
$DGC / #DeGPT Let’s start with the uncomfortable truth:
Yes, many people lost money. Yes, the risk is high right now. Without a fully implemented HTTP 402 (Payment Required), real monetization simply doesn’t exist. No pay-per-use, no micropayments, no real token economy. If 402 doesn’t ship, DeGPT stays unfinished and markets are ruthless about that.
But this is also where things can turn!
If 402 is delivered, the story changes fast:
- Every request creates real value - Token burns become a real mechanism - Usage starts to matter more than hype
A few thousand users won’t move anything. DeGPT needs 50k–100k+ active users to reach real volume and demand.
Looking toward 2026:
AI and LLMs won’t be optional. They’ll be basic infrastructure, especially outside the Western world. Western markets are crowded, expensive, and heavily regulated. Meanwhile, millions of people still have no access at all. That’s the emotional core of this bet: opening AI to those who are currently locked out.
The risk is real. The pain is real. But that’s exactly why this isn’t boring.
If 402 ships and adoption follows, this isn’t just another token. It’s infrastructure in the making. The biggest returns never come when everything feels safe. They come when conviction meets execution — before the crowd arrives.
$DGC 🚨 DGC is not being delisted! The last official announcement from Binance Alpha was on Dec 19, 2025 – everything else is rumor. Stick to official sources and don’t let misinformation confuse you. 💪 #DGC #Binance #FactCheck
Technology without a payment layer is a dead end. As long as HTTP Status 402 is missing, true monetization is blocked. No pay-per-call, no micro-transactions, no autonomous agents paying for execution, no serious API economy. That’s not future-proof — it’s incomplete.
At the same time, token economics can’t be ignored. If supply keeps growing while demand stays capped, price pressure is inevitable. Token burns are not cosmetic, they are a corrective mechanism against inflation.
The community didn’t invent this narrative — it identified a structural gap early.
What matters now is execution. Add 402 as a protocol-level standard. Introduce consistent token burns tied to usage.
Do that, and utility becomes measurable, demand becomes real, and confidence follows. The path forward is clear — it’s time to implement it.