TheEndofrussia2026 -USDT

#USA34f9d4d6c26e8fb46d pip install python-binance pandas numpy ta matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

# Symulacja ceny BTC
np.random.seed(42)
days = 100
price = np.cumsum(np.random.normal(0, 500, days)) + 40000

df = pd.DataFrame({"price": price})
df["ema20"] = df["price"].ewm(span=20).mean()
df["ema50"] = df["price"].ewm(span=50).mean()

plt.figure(figsize=(10, 5))
plt.plot(df["price"], label="Cena BTC")
plt.plot(df["ema20"], label="EMA 20")
plt.plot(df["ema50"], label="EMA 50")

#Geopoliticalpuzzle $ETH
Спершу розкрий смисл тексту українською мовою: You've raised some fascinating and interconnected ideas about global politics, alliances, and Ukraine's future. It's clear you're passionate about these events and their potential ripple effects. As we explore this together, let's think step by step, like curious investigators piecing together a puzzle. I'll pose some questions to help us unpack your thoughts and encourage deeper reflection—what evidence shapes your views, and what might we learn from considering different angles?

First, on the reported capture of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela
0

1

2
. You describe it as an arrest by American special forces, involving figures like Trump and perhaps even Zelenskyy or European influences outplaying Putin. What sources or observations led you to connect this event to a loss of Russian influence in Venezuela? For instance, how might we evaluate whether Venezuela truly fits into an "axis" with Syria (Assad) and Iran (Ayatollah), and what role do you see terrorism or global chaos playing here? If we imagine Putin feeling "intimidated" or facing potential betrayals in his inner circle, what historical examples of leaders in similar positions could help us predict what might happen next? Could there be other factors, like economic pressures or internal Venezuelan dynamics, that explain these developments without a direct "outplaying" narrative?

Shifting to the broader implications for Putin and Russia—you suggest this could signal him losing grip on a third allied state, potentially leading to surrenders or shifts in loyalty. What makes you think Maduro's situation might mirror risks for Putin's close allies? Let's consider: If alliances like these are built on shared interests (e.g., opposing Western influence), how fragile might they be when one partner faces isolation? What evidence from recent geopolitics could support or challenge the idea that this "erupts the world into chaos and lawlessness"? I'm curious—do you see this as a net positive for global stability, or could it introduce new dangers we haven't anticipated?

Now, turning to Ukraine's elections and post-victory prospects. You list strong figures like Budanov, Zaluzhny, Zelenskyy, Arakhamia, Malyuk, and Poroshenko as potential players in a "great game" after triumphing over Russia and the "axis of evil." That's an inspiring vision of a strong Ukraine with a bright future! What qualities do you admire in each of these individuals that make them stand out? For example, how might Budanov's intelligence background or Zaluzhny's military experience shape their leadership in a peacetime election
10

12

13
? If we assume a victory over Russia, what challenges—such as rebuilding infrastructure, unifying the nation, or navigating international alliances—do you think these leaders would need to address first? And how could the ongoing war influence who emerges as the strongest candidate? Polls suggest varying levels of support among them; what do you think drives public opinion in Ukraine right now, and how might that evolve by 2026?

Overall, your perspective paints a picture of shifting power dynamics and hope for Ukraine. What one key insight do you hope to gain from reflecting on these events? Let's keep the conversation going—your thoughts could reveal even more layers to this complex web!,а після вернемося до впливу Тайваня, США Євро́пи і України на комуністичний матершиний і не глибокий,поверхностний токсичний Китай і його "друг" терористичній глибоко токсичний низько кваліфікований,ідентичний по суті слабких сторін сирьєвой придаток Китаю тінь СРСР гулаг спецслужбіста с претензією на історію і культуру,владу і приклад Божої благодаті іг гармонії,святой орієнтир режиму путіна-сталіна-гітлера-романова!?#США34f9d4d6c26e8fb46d

#Geopoliticalpuzzle $ETH
Спершу розкрий смисл тексту українською мовою: You've raised some fascinating and interconnected ideas about global politics, alliances, and Ukraine's future. It's clear you're passionate about these events and their potential ripple effects. As we explore this together, let's think step by step, like curious investigators piecing together a puzzle. I'll pose some questions to help us unpack your thoughts and encourage deeper reflection—what evidence shapes your views, and what might we learn from considering different angles?

First, on the reported capture of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela
0

1

2
. You describe it as an arrest by American special forces, involving figures like Trump and perhaps even Zelenskyy or European influences outplaying Putin. What sources or observations led you to connect this event to a loss of Russian influence in Venezuela? For instance, how might we evaluate whether Venezuela truly fits into an "axis" with Syria (Assad) and Iran (Ayatollah), and what role do you see terrorism or global chaos playing here? If we imagine Putin feeling "intimidated" or facing potential betrayals in his inner circle, what historical examples of leaders in similar positions could help us predict what might happen next? Could there be other factors, like economic pressures or internal Venezuelan dynamics, that explain these developments without a direct "outplaying" narrative?

Shifting to the broader implications for Putin and Russia—you suggest this could signal him losing grip on a third allied state, potentially leading to surrenders or shifts in loyalty. What makes you think Maduro's situation might mirror risks for Putin's close allies? Let's consider: If alliances like these are built on shared interests (e.g., opposing Western influence), how fragile might they be when one partner faces isolation? What evidence from recent geopolitics could support or challenge the idea that this "erupts the world into chaos and lawlessness"? I'm curious—do you see this as a net positive for global stability, or could it introduce new dangers we haven't anticipated?

Now, turning to Ukraine's elections and post-victory prospects. You list strong figures like Budanov, Zaluzhny, Zelenskyy, Arakhamia, Malyuk, and Poroshenko as potential players in a "great game" after triumphing over Russia and the "axis of evil." That's an inspiring vision of a strong Ukraine with a bright future! What qualities do you admire in each of these individuals that make them stand out? For example, how might Budanov's intelligence background or Zaluzhny's military experience shape their leadership in a peacetime election
10

12

13
? If we assume a victory over Russia, what challenges—such as rebuilding infrastructure, unifying the nation, or navigating international alliances—do you think these leaders would need to address first? And how could the ongoing war influence who emerges as the strongest candidate? Polls suggest varying levels of support among them; what do you think drives public opinion in Ukraine right now, and how might that evolve by 2026?

Overall, your perspective paints a picture of shifting power dynamics and hope for Ukraine. What one key insight do you hope to gain from reflecting on these events? Let's keep the conversation going—your thoughts could reveal even more layers to this complex web!,а після вернемося до впливу Тайваня, США Євро́пи і України на комуністичний матершиний і не глибокий,поверхностний токсичний Китай і його "друг" терористичній глибоко токсичний низько кваліфікований,ідентичний по суті слабких сторін сирьєвой придаток Китаю тінь СРСР гулаг спецслужбіста с претензією на історію і культуру,владу і приклад Божої благодаті іг гармонії,святой орієнтир режиму путіна-сталіна-гітлера-романова!?#США34f9d4d6c26e8fb46d

Gotowe. Poniżej — adaptacja do formatu Binance Research + wyjaśnienie wykresu BTC vs nośniki energii.

Binance Research — Wgląd w rynek

Temat: BTC i czynnik energetyczny w kontekście wojny RF–Ukraina
Typ: Makro / Wpływ geopolityczny
Horyzont: Średnio–długoterminowy (2022–2025)

$BTC vs #EnergyPrices — Przegląd korelacji

📊 Wykres (powyżej) pokazuje ilustrującą korelację między:

Dobrze. Oto dostosowana wersja w formacie raportu kryptowalutowego o neutralnym tonie, odpowiednia dla traderów, inwestorów i analityków.

Temat: Ryzyka geopolityczne i wojna RF–Ukraina
Okres analizy: 2022–2025
Fokus: Zmienność, czynnik energetyczny, zachowanie kapitału

1. Tło geopolityczne

📦 JavaScript (Node.js / Przeglądarka)
Skopiuj kod
Js
/**
* Neutralny Silnik Sygnałów Krypto
* Aktywa: BTC, ETH, BNB
* Czynniki: Techniczne + Ryzyko Geopolityczne (modyfikator zmienności)
* Autor: AI-syntetyzowany (neutralny, niepolityczny)
*/
// -------------------- KONFIGURACJA --------------------
const AKTYWA = ["BTC", "ETH", "BNB"];
// Współczynniki ryzyka regionalnego (0 = brak ryzyka, 1 = ekstremalne)
// Edytowalne, neutralne dane wejściowe
const GEO_RYZYKO = {
Ukraina: 0.85,
Izrael: 0.75,
Chiny: 0.65,
Rosja: 0.80,
Indie: 0.45,

#DEAL #rosja #USA Biuro Parlamentu Europejskiego w Irlandii #EUROPA #ukraine #ekonomia #KRYPTOWALUTA #KAPITAŁ #WOJNA Na grudzień 2025 roku, Rosja i Chiny mają silne partnerstwo gospodarcze, z wymianą handlową przekraczającą 200 #miliardów dolarów. Chiny są największym partnerem handlowym Rosji, zapewniając wsparcie gospodarcze w obliczu zachodnich sankcji—Rosja eksportuje zniżkowaną energię (ropa/gaz stanowią ~75% jej sprzedaży do Chin), podczas gdy importuje towary i technologie. Jednak handel spadł o ~10% od szczytów w 2024 roku z powodu napięć, takich jak rosyjskie ograniczenia importowe na chińskie samochody w celu ochrony lokalnych przemysłów. Choć Rosja staje się coraz bardziej zależna, to jednak jest to wzajemny strategiczny związek, a nie pełna podporządkowanie. "Dodatek" może to przesadzać, ale zależność jest oczywista.