With Xmr exploding to all time high, that can only mean a few things.
1. Zec is bound to catch up, and is lagging due to recent resignation news. (since Zcash is a better tech than Xmr, for those of you who argue otherwise, you can check for yourself)
2. Xmr's price is falling back down, since it cannot sustain a higher valuation than a better protocol (Zec).
that leads to the analysis of how much higher of a valuation of Xmr is to Zec.
Currently, the market cap (not fdv) of Zec is 6.83B while xmr is at 12.85B.
i would argue this leaves a lot of room for margin of safety.
side note: the fact that Xmr is exploding, it means potential narrative shift to privacy again. ( I think tailwind for privacy is here, not just short term but to stay)
in terms of interest of "privacy" in google search, developed countries are more prevalent. (more potential buying power)
The great people actually share a lot in common in their thinking.
In one of Charlie Munger's clips, he speaks about the human psychology of misjudgement, he mentions the Standford experiment of the guard and prisoner.
In that example, he says it's not just RECIPROCATION TENDENCY and ROLE THEORY (you are expected to act out your role) that caused it, but also CONSISTENCY and COMMITMENT TENDENCY, the more you act out certain behaviour, the more you are pounding that idea into your head.
This resonates with what Jordan Peterson has said, which is: you are what you act out.
he says nobody is sophisticated enough to act one way and be another in their own head.
Peter Thiel's idea of evaluating a business. a business create X% of value and capture Y% X and Y are independent value.
most biggest innovations have their profits competed away, so the Y% is close to zero. eg: railroad, airlines etc.
when he did paypal, he calculated most cash flow come from years later, thus it's important to evaluate whether business would still exit long after, rather than purely focusing on growth rate, eg: a company can be doing growth at 100% a year and go out of business in 5 years time because of competition. thus it's not worth investing from an investor perspective.
therefore he likes business in monopoly because of Y% and business life expectancy.
that got me thinking, how do you know a business has defensible moat over the long run especially we live in a world where there is breakthrough in tech everyday, one way of him evaluating is whether the product has network effect.
while it's true, we simply do not know what is going to come along and new innovations can still disrupt everything, eg: AI search to google search (maybe not the best example as al search now complements google search to some extent )
there is a tweet from @naval "Continuous learning is the only defensible moat."
doesn't this reach the conclusion of always investing in capable and ethical people, and that's almost the only determining factor?
tho in the book "poor Charlie's almanack", Charlie did say if you had to pick between good business and good management team, he would lean more towards good business.
I actually wonder if that is because he doesn't invest in businesses that have high multiples anyway (as he describes as having high margin of safety), therefore he leans towards the good business side, and it doesn't apply as much in tech companies.
I find it quite funny that often many kols would talk about macro as if they were experts/ spend years studying it, marco is super complicated with many strings pulling in many different directions.
I personally would only listen to people like ray dalio that have remarkable achievements in life.
Piscina protejată Zec face o revenire, interesul deschis crește rapid, s-ar putea să putem profita de acest moment pentru a atinge maximele istorice. #zec #zcash
Am cumpărat această scădere, sub formă de BTC, monedele majore au loc să crească deoarece prețul actual este destul de departe de maximul istoric, r/r este decent, rata de finanțare este în mare parte aproape de 0, similar cu aprilie, părerea mea, doar că nu atât de extrem. #btc
Crypto depends very much on narrative, thus the strength of a particular narrative is very important.
How do we evaluate the strength of a narrative? If a narrative has been here since the dawn of time, that means the narrative is more true than the others because it has survived the test of time.
Privacy is that narrative
technology is evolving ever faster, we often don’t know which narrative to catch because everything could just change tmr, but yet, freedom, privacy, these topics are timely, and never go away, bitcoin rose because of freedom.
Now it’s up to us to contemplate privacy once again, in the form of Zcash. Use @zashi_app wallet for your own sake.
Apetitul pentru risc este încă foarte puternic, S&P 500 a devenit de fapt verde după o scădere bruscă, scăderile au continuat să fie cumpărate, cripto este puțin subevaluat în raport cu acțiunile, în opinia mea. Voi continua să monitorizez.
Am cumpărat această scădere, sub forma robinhood în acțiuni, mai sigur să pariezi pe această scădere în capital pentru moment, voi căuta să cumpăr și în crypto.
Volumul vorbește de la sine, cu adevărat incredibil.
Singurul dezavantaj este că este clar vizibilă presiunea vânzărilor la aproximativ 700$, dar dacă ne consolidăm aici prin schimbarea proprietarilor și extragerea BTC, atunci aceasta ar fi o tranzacție de mare succes, raportul r/r este încă solid.
Apropo, ignorați tot zgomotul, uitați-vă doar la date, o regulă generală bună este că traderii care vă oferă o mie de monede sunt adesea traderi incapabili.
La fel cum o teorie care explică totul nu explică nimic sau dacă totul este de aceeași importanță, nimic nu este important.
My thesis remains the same, I SEE MORE UPSIDE TO ZEC
I have been closely monitoring Zec$ data, and I have to say it’s just impressive, and most people don’t know how to check Zcash data, which makes it even more effective.
Small recap, negative funding rate, price surge driven by spot, healthy dynamic.
BTC, ETH, BNB all down today, and $Zec remains strong, BUY COINS THAT PERFORM BEST IN DOWNTURN.
Unless we have a bear market coming in already, $Zec is going to outperform.
DOUBLE DOWN ON YOUR WINNERS NOT LOSERS. (Peter Lynch)
Aster este un produs strategic al Binance împotriva hiperliquidității. (CZ a spus deschis că crede că dex-ul va prelua în viitor și dacă ar fi fost cu zece ani mai tânăr, ar construi un dex)
și cred că CZ spune că tratează Aster ca pe BNB, ceea ce ar putea implica că va lucra în interiorul Aster? Ar putea să aibă gânduri de genul: până la urmă sunt încă tânăr haha. @CZ Cine știe, dar acesta este cu siguranță o miză +EV pe termen lung. #aster
Conectați-vă pentru a explora mai mult conținut
Explorați cele mai recente știri despre criptomonede
⚡️ Luați parte la cele mai recente discuții despre criptomonede