Anne Lisa

Even though Walrus is built on the Sui blockchain, its design allows it to serve a broader purpose. It can provide decentralized storage for apps on other blockchains too for example Ethereum or Solana via standard APIs and integration layers. This means Walrus has the potential to become a multi-chain data layer, not tied to a single ecosystem.

This matters because storage needs are universal. Whether an app uses Ethereum for computation or Sui for logic, the data itself can live in a common, decentralized storage network that anyone can plug into. That level of interoperability moves storage out of being a bottleneck and into being a shared utility for the entire Web3 space.

#walrus

@Walrus 🦭/acc
$WAL

Walrus isn’t just theoretical — it’s already being used in ways that hint at the future of Web3 data. For example:

• Decentralized frontends — “Walrus Sites” allow apps to host entire frontends (not just backend data) in a decentralized way. This means a whole website can be served without relying on a single server.

• Media and content — projects and media companies can store large archives of content, like videos and articles, in a resilient decentralized structure.

• AI datasets — the storage model supports large datasets needed for training or inference in AI (especially when paired with high availability and verifiable data).

These uses show that Walrus is not just for one type of app; it’s the data layer many categories of next-generation applications will need.

#walrus
@Walrus 🦭/acc

$WAL

Walrus isn’t just a storage layer; it has its own economic ecosystem powered by the WAL token. WAL is used in several key ways within the network:

• Payment for storage — users pay in WAL to store data.

• Staking and incentives — node operators and their delegators stake WAL to help secure storage and earn rewards.

• Governance — WAL holders can participate in deciding important network parameters, such as pricing or penalties.

The way this works is designed to align incentives: those who help make the network stable and reliable earn rewards, while bad behavior (like failing to store data) can be penalized. This economic layer gives Walrus not just a technical storage system, but a self-governing, incentivized data ecosystem.

#walrus
@Walrus 🦭/acc

$WAL

Most RWA talk focuses on giants. But Dusk’s own writing makes a strong point: SMEs are the backbone of the economy, especially in Europe.

Dusk notes that SMEs are over 99% of EU businesses, employ over 83 million people, and generate over half of Europe’s GDP.   Yet these companies often struggle with capital markets: fundraising is slow and costly, managing shareholders is paperwork-heavy, and secondary liquidity is limited.

Dusk’s argument is that tokenization and native issuance can change that by turning shares or debt into regulated digital securities with:

• transferability between verified investors

• automated compliance (KYC/AML/transfer rules)

• programmable dividends and voting

• real-time ownership tracking

• lower issuance/management costs

This is a practical narrative because it ties blockchain to a real pain point: private markets are inefficient.

And it connects back to Dusk’s core: Dusk states privacy and compliance can coexist, and that confidentiality is necessary for compliance in many cases (you prove you meet rules without exposing sensitive business data).

A simple example: if a private company issues shares, it may not want its cap table and investor actions public on a block explorer. But it still needs legal compliance and clean records. That’s the kind of “real world” fit Dusk is aiming for.

#dusk

@Dusk
$DUSK

Most staking systems are simple: lock tokens, earn rewards, wait. That works, but it’s rigid and rigid systems are hard to integrate into modern DeFi or user-friendly apps.

Dusk introduced Hyperstaking as “stake abstraction,” starting with delegated staking and moving toward a liquid staking model. The idea is that users can stake DUSK and still keep flexibility through liquid staking tokens that can be traded, lent, or used in other protocols.

This matters because staking is not just security — it’s user experience and capital efficiency. If a chain wants real adoption, it can’t force users to choose between “support the network” and “use your funds.”

Hyperstaking also matters for product design. Dusk has described Hyperstaking as enabling custom logic in staking contracts (like privacy-preserving staking and referral-based staking rewards). That turns staking into an app layer instead of a fixed rule.

A simple example: imagine a regulated platform that wants users to stake for access tiers, or a product that bundles staking + rewards in a clean UX. Programmable staking makes those experiences possible without inventing weird off-chain systems.

#dusk
@Dusk

$DUSK

After years of creating content and studying digital systems, I’ve learned a simple rule: the best technology disappears. Users don’t admire it, they rely on it. Electricity, the internet, banking rails—none of these are exciting, but all of them are essential. That’s the mental framework I use when evaluating Plasma.

Most crypto systems still feel like they want users to adapt to them. Learn new terms. Manage keys carefully. Accept volatility. Plasma flips this idea. It assumes users don’t want to learn anything new. They want money to behave like money. That assumption changes everything.

Plasma’s stablecoin-first design is central to this philosophy. Stability creates confidence. Confidence creates usage. When people know the value they send and receive will not change unexpectedly, they are willing to use the system for real needs like rent, payroll, or subscriptions. This moves crypto from theory into daily life.

One of the most thoughtful design choices Plasma makes is how it handles fees. Instead of forcing users to hold a separate token or understand network mechanics, it allows fees to be abstracted away. Sometimes the app pays. Sometimes the fee is bundled invisibly into the transaction. The important part is not how it works technically, but how it feels. It feels simple. And simplicity scales.

From a builder’s perspective, Plasma also respects developer reality. It is EVM-compatible, which means developers don’t need to throw away years of experience. They can reuse tools, contracts, and knowledge they already have. This lowers the cost of experimentation and increases the quality of applications built on the network. When builders face less friction, innovation becomes practical instead of theoretical.

What also stands out is how Plasma treats value. The token is not positioned as a shortcut to wealth. It exists to secure the network, coordinate validators, and support governance. Long-term value depends on actual payment activity. This aligns incentives honestly. If the system is useful, it grows. If it isn’t, it fades. That honesty is rare in crypto.

Plasma reminds me that mass adoption will not come from excitement. It will come from reliability. When sending digital dollars feels as normal as sending a message, people will stop thinking about the technology behind it. And when that happens crypto will finally become part of everyday life.

#Plasma

$XPL

Most staking systems are simple: lock tokens, earn rewards, wait. That works, but it’s rigid and rigid systems are hard to integrate into modern DeFi or user-friendly apps.

Dusk introduced Hyperstaking as “stake abstraction,” starting with delegated staking and moving toward a liquid staking model. The idea is that users can stake DUSK and still keep flexibility through liquid staking tokens that can be traded, lent, or used in other protocols.

This matters because staking is not just security — it’s user experience and capital efficiency. If a chain wants real adoption, it can’t force users to choose between “support the network” and “use your funds.”

Hyperstaking also matters for product design. Dusk has described Hyperstaking as enabling custom logic in staking contracts (like privacy-preserving staking and referral-based staking rewards). That turns staking into an app layer instead of a fixed rule.

A simple example: imagine a regulated platform that wants users to stake for access tiers, or a product that bundles staking + rewards in a clean UX. Programmable staking makes those experiences possible without inventing weird off-chain systems.

#dusk
@Dusk

$DUSK